10 reasons to oppose illegal immigration protection policies

by Patrick Briney, Ph.D, President Arkansas Republican Assembly
Issued: Patrick Briney, President ARRA, Feb. 26, 2007

It is the duty of government to protect and secure the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of its citizens. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has been charged to protect United States citizens from harm caused by non-U.S. citizens. To this end, aliens, “… may be denied admission on the grounds of health, criminal history, security or terrorism concerns, the likelihood of their ‘becoming a public charge,’ their seeking work in the United States without proper labor certification and qualifications, prior illegal entry or violations of immigration law, lack of proper documentation, or previous removal from the country.” (Immigration Policy in the United States, February 2006, The Congress of the United States/Congressional Budget Office).

The United States welcomes and accepts more legal immigrants as permanent residents than the rest of the world combined. However, there are an estimated twenty million or more illegal aliens residing in the U.S. in violation of U.S. immigration laws. Such blatant contempt for U.S. laws, its law abiding citizens, and its legalized immigrants should not be tolerated. Rather these criminals should be punished and banned from enjoying the privileges of U.S. citizenry.

Illegal immigrants should be treated as criminals because:

  1. Illegal activity should be punished not rewarded.
    1. Failure to punish illegal activity encourages more illegal activity, emboldens criminals, breeds public cynicism, and discourages others from obeying laws.
    2. Illegal activity, unpunished, threatens American values of law and order. Criminal behavior should not be tolerated.
    3. Illegal aliens show contempt for the values and laws that make America the land of opportunity and desirable to reside in. They abuse the generosity and compassion of the American people. They belittle all immigrants who reside in America legally.
  2. Illegal aliens are a threat to national security.
    1. “The greatest threat to U.S. homeland security comes from illegals who enter the country through its porous borders in order to attack…. It is all too easy for illegal immigrants to slip in beneath the radar, eschewing the legalization process and never being detected and deported…. Europe is now paying the price for open borders, past and present non-enforcement of immigration laws, and overly generous asylum policies.” (Jan C. Ting, professor of law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law. July 12, 2005, Immigration and National Security, Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of Foreign Policy Research Institute).
    2. Based on figures in 2000, “The Census Bureau estimated that perhaps 115,000 people from Middle Eastern countries live in the United States illegally.” (Steven A. Camarota, January 22, 2002, Census Bureau: Over 100,000 Illegal Aliens from the Middle East, New Government Report Raises Concerns in Light of Terrorist Threat, Center for immigration Studies).
    3. “While the vast majority of illegals from the Middle East are not terrorists, the fact that tens of thousands of people from that region and millions more from the rest of the world can settle in the United States illegally means that terrorists who wish to do so face few obstacles. We can’t protect ourselves from terrorism without dealing with illegal immigration.” (Ibid.)
    4. The border security report delivered by Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s office states that, “The Triborder Region is a focal point of Islamic extremism,” the report states. “Al Qaeda leadership plans to use criminal alien smuggling organizations to bring terrorist operatives across the border into the U.S.” (Kevin Mooney, August 21, 2006, Texas Sheriffs Say Terrorists Entering US from Mexico, Cybernews Service, accessed 2/26/2007).
    5. “… a Pakistani man living in the U.S. illegally has been indicted for aiding the Taliban and training with firearms for jihad against Americans.” (U.S. Department of Justice, November 28, 2006, Two charged in plan to aid Taliban, 2/26/2007).
  3. Illegal aliens hold down the pay of American workers. “The National Research Council, in a 1997 study entitled ‘The New Americans,’ estimated that immigration reduced the wages of workers with less than a high school degree by about 5 percent. These workers roughly correspond to the poorest 10 percent of the workforce.” “Non-whites appear to lose jobs to immigrants and their earnings are depressed by immigrants.” A 1997 report published by the Rand Corporation, entitled ‘Immigration in a Changing Economy: California’s Experience,’ and authored by Kevin McCarthy and Georges Vernez (1997) estimated that in California between 128,200 and 194,000 people were unemployed or withdrawn from the workforce because of immigration. Almost all of these individuals either are high school dropouts or have only a high school degree. Additionally, most are either women or minorities.” (Steven A. Camarota, August 29, 2006, Immigration’s Impact On American Workers, Testimony Prepared for the House Judiciary Committee, Center for Immigration Studies).
  4. The influx of cheap, illegal labor favors unscrupulous business owners, illegal workers and their families, and discriminates against the low income, law-abiding US citizens with cheaper, illegal labor.
  5. Illegal aliens add a tax burden on citizens.
    1. Illegal aliens drain on tax monies that would otherwise be spent for law-abiding citizens. Social services for illegal aliens were estimated to cost the law-abiding American taxpayers, in 2004, over $70 billion annually (Federation for American Immigration Reform, 2004, accessed 2/26/2007). Most current estimates for costs of illegal alien services since 1996 is almost 400 trillion dollars (ImmigrationCounters.com, accessed 2/26/2007).
    2. New Jersey spends more than $2.1 billion annually on public expenditures for education, medical care, and incarceration for the estimated 372,000 illegal aliens residing in the state. Governor Jon Corzine admitted, that illegal aliens are, “one of the worst tax burdens in the United States.” The Costs of Illegal Immigration to New Jerseyites.
    3. Officials in California report that providing illegal immigrants these social services costs the state $3 billion annually. (Close Up Foundation, accessed 2/26/2007).
    4. Illegal aliens increase poverty. Most “lack a high school education resulting in increased poverty and expanded government expenditure.”
    5. Most illegal aliens occupy low income employment and are more affected by downturns in the economy, which in turn sends them to social welfare services.
    6. “Low-skill immigration siphons off government anti-poverty funding and makes government efforts to shrink poverty less effective.” (Robert E. Rector, October 25, 2006, Importing Poverty: Immigration and Poverty in the United States: A Book of Charts, Heritage Foundation).
    7. “Low-skill immigrants pay little in taxes and receive high levels of government benefits and services.” (Ibid.)
    8. “The National Academy of Sciences has estimated that each immigrant without a high school degree will cost U.S. taxpayers, on average, $89,000 over the course of his or her lifetime.” (Ibid.)
    9. The total K-12 school expenditure for illegal immigrants costs the states nearly $12 billion annually, …when the children born here to illegal aliens are added, the costs more than double to $28.6 billion. (Jack Martin, 2005, Breaking the Piggy Bank: How Illegal Immigration is Sending Schools Into the Red, Federation for American Immigration Reform).
    10. Most illegal aliens do not have health insurance and need to resort to public assistance more often. “Uninsured people receive medical care in hospital emergency departments (EDs) under the coercive Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act of 1985 (EMTALA), which obligates hospitals to treat the uninsured but does not pay for that care.” “Even ambulances from Mexico come to American EDs with indigents because the drivers know that EMTALA requires accepting patients who come within 250 yards of a hospital.” “EMTALA rewards them with extensive, expensive medical services, free of charge, if they claim an emergency need for care.” “In 1994, 74,987 anchor babies in California hospital maternity units cost $215 million and constituted 36 percent of all Medi-Cal births. Now they account for substantially more than half.” (Madeleine Pelner Cosman, Ph.D., Esq., Spring 2005, Illegal Aliens and American Medicine, Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 10 Number 1).
    11. State and local governments spend some $4 billion a year to provide health care to illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children and $20 to $24 billion to educate children from illegal alien households (Steven A. Camarota, August 24, 2006, Immigration’s Impact on Public Coffers, Testimony Prepared for the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims, accessed 2/26/2007).
    12. According to House Concurrent Resolution 95, which passed the U.S. Senate on March 26, 2003, the “costs associated with the incarceration of undocumented criminal aliens” cost state and local governments more than $13 billion in FY’02.
    13. The drain by illegal aliens on American tax monies lowers the quality in education and services that belong to legal American citizens.
  6. Illegal aliens are siphoning the resources out of the U.S. to other economies.
    1. 10 billion dollars annually are sent from U.S. to Mexico.
    2. Almost 22 trillion dollars have been wired to Mexico since 1996 (ImmigrationCounters.com, accessed 2/26/2007).
  7. Illegal aliens lobby for policies favoring criminals and against the best interests of legal U.S. citizens.
    1. In response to an illegal alien lobbying demonstration, Tom Tancredo stated that, “Amnesty is an affront to American law and America’s tradition of legal immigration,” Tancredo said in a written statement. “If the protesters really want to honor America’s values, they would stand up to lawbreakers and embrace an enforcement-first approach to fixing our broken system.” (Allan Chernoff, Monday, April 10, 2006, Rallies across U.S. call for illegal immigrant rights, CNN.com, accessed 2/26/2007).
    2. In 1997, then-President Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico said in Chicago: “I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders.” Phyllis Schlafly, Nov. 28, 2001, Is it Assimilation or Invasion? )accessed 3/1/2007).
  8. Illegal immigrants do not assimilate into U.S. society and are causing a splintering of society along racial and cultural lines.
    1. The BBC reported May 30 that, “The Latinization of California is nothing short of a revolution. California will become a predominantly Spanish-speaking state within the next few years. And, as the majority population, there is really no need, or incentive, for them to assimilate into mainstream American society as their predecessors have always done. Whether Latinos then decide to push for greater autonomy, to seek a political agenda of their own with closer ties to Mexico and Central America is very much up for grabs.” (Yeh, Ling Ling, May 4, 2006, Amnesty’s impact on future of U.S., WorldNetDaily.net, accessed 3/1/2007)
    2. President Clinton cautioned that, “Within five years there will be no majority race in our largest state, California.” … “In a little more than 50 years” … “there will be no majority race in the United States.” … “The driving force behind our increasing diversity is a new, large wave of immigration. It is changing the face of America.” … “No other nation in history has gone through a change of this magnitude in so short a time.” … “What do the changes mean? They can either strengthen and unite us, or they can weaken and divide us. We must decide… But mark my words, unless we handle this well, immigration of this sweep and scope could threaten the bonds of our union.” (Bill Clinton, 1998, Portland State University’s Commencement, accessed 3/1/2007).
  9. Illegal immigration threatens America quality of life. It is linked to drug smuggling, human sex trade, murder, and other crimes, which threaten the safety of Americans and increase the burden on the US law enforcement system and resources.
    1. “After a steady annual reduction in crime, the annual FBI Uniform Crime Report reveals a slow but sure yearly increase in crime, especially violent crime. Some criminologists attribute the rise in crime to illegal aliens who come into the United States with a criminal background.” (Fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police Jim Kouri, June 22, 2006, Illegal aliens linked to rise in crime statistics, Renew America, accessed 2/26/2007).
    2. Based on a one-year study analyzing 1500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute in Atlanta estimates that there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. (WorldNetDaily.com, Posted: May 31, 2006, Study: 1 million sex crimes by illegals, accessed 2/26/2007).
    3. “In the population study of 55,322 illegal aliens, researchers found that they were arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about 8 arrests per illegal alien. Nearly all had more than 1 arrest. Thirty-eight percent (about 21,000) had between 2 and 5 arrests, 32 percent (about 18,000) had between 6 and 10 arrests, and 26 percent (about 15,000) had 11 or more arrests. Most of the arrests occurred after 1990.” (Jim Kouri, June 22, 2006, Illegal aliens linked to rise in crime statistics, Renew America, accessed 2/26/2007).
    4. U.S. agents discovered an elaborate drug-smuggling tunnel between Tijuana and San Diego. “The tunnel runs 2,400 feet through sandstone and compacted sand and is equipped with lighting, ventilation and groundwater drainage systems. The tunnel was the work of a well-funded and determined drug-smuggling group.” “Mexican agents seized 2 tons of marijuana on the Mexican side. Their U.S. counterparts found 200 pounds.” No one knows how many tons of drugs were transported through the tunnel. (Onell R. Soto and Leslie Berestein, January 27, 2006, Builders of passage were well-funded, investigators say, Union-Tribune, San Diego, CA, accessed 2/26/2007).
  10. There is nothing right about being illegal.


Source: 10 reasons to oppose illegal immigration protection policies

Posted in Border Security, crime, economics, immigration, multiculturalism, taxes, terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

New Evidence Confirms Cell Phone EMFs Are a Cancer Risk | Nwo Report

cell phone EMFs


The world very quickly came to realize, when the World Health Organization called glyphosate a “possible carcinogen” that mass market products available to the public were not always necessarily safe. Corporations, lobbying and government dictated final outcomes, often discrediting or largely ignoring the recommendations of world health bodies.

In the probably carcinogenic tradition, the WHO also labelled our cell phones with a similar warning. In 2011, now six years ago, the World Health Organization openly declared cell phone radiation as a cause for concern, classing the electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” The research was conducted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and although we became mildly aware of the possible side effects, the reality was largely ignored by official governing bodies.

The research compiled data from multiple areas including animal testing and cancer rates, exposure data, cancer in humans and ‘mechanistic data.’ The results demonstrated suggested critically reviewed evidence as “strong enough to support a conclusion…that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk,” said Dr Jonathan Samet, the Chairman of the Working Group responsible for the research.

“Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings it is important that additional research be conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or texting,” stated IARC Director Christopher Wild at the time.

cell phone EMFs

New evidence has now surfaced, providing sufficient evidence to warrant public warning, says Joel Moskowitz of U.C. Berekley’s School of Public Health in an ABC7 News report. Moskowitz sued the state to obtain the withheld information report.

“We have evidence of brain tumors and other head and neck tumors. We also have evidence of sperm damage in males, infertility in females.”

The difference is two-pronged: firstly, the state of California appears to have deliberately kept the cancer risk information a secret; and secondly, this information coming from a government agency officially mentions the harmful effects of cell phone radiation.

Aptly describing the cover-up like that of the tobacco industry, Moskowitz says they “follow[ed] the same playbook.”

The release of the report, sparking the renewed debate of cell phone safety, ultimately wasn’t released to the public earlier because the CDC insisted more research was required. However, Ellie Marks of the California Brain Tumor Association disagrees. “People need to know, people are unaware that cell phones as they are used now are not safe,” she said.

cell phone EMFs

The Cell Phones and Health report the CDC didn’t yet want to release – that has “Draft and Not for Public Release” stamped across its pages – lists studies, resulting concerns and a point form notation to lower your risk of EMF exposure. It also notates the susceptibility of EMFs on a child’s brain through to teen years, “which may make children and teens more sensitive to EMF exposures,” and to ensure set limits for this age group – including limiting “texting,” and calls for “emergencies” only.

The document further states:

“Cell phones, like other electronic devices, emit a kind of energy called radiofrequency EMFs (electromagnetic fields). Health officials are concerned about possible health effects from cell phone EMFs because some recent studies suggest that long-term cell phone use may increase the risk of brain cancer and other health problems […]

“Several studies have found that people with certain kinds of brain cancer were more likely to have used cell phones for 10 years or more. Most of the cancers were on the same side of the head that people usually held their phones. Although the chance of developing brain cancer is very small, these studies suggest that regular cell phone use increases the risk of developing some kinds of brain cancer. Some studies have also linked exposure to EMFs from cell phones to fertility problems. As more studies are done and we learn about possible risks for cancer and other health problems linked to cell phone use, the recommendations on this fact sheet may change.”

The CDC continues to call for further research without offering solid guidelines to the public to protect themselves. Moskowitz argues that an earlier release of this publication “could have saved some lives […] seven years ago.”

Source: New Evidence Confirms Cell Phone EMFs Are a Cancer Risk | Nwo Report

Posted in medical | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One more reason never to trust the CDC « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

One more reason never to trust the CDC

My interview with former CBS star reporter: not fake news

By Jon Rappoport

CBS has published the names of sites they claim are fake news. Well, what about CBS itself?

Unless you’ve been living in a cave, you’re aware that a film, Vaxxed, has been showing in theaters across America and overseas—and audiences are stunned by its revelations.

Vaxxed exposes a huge scandal at the CDC, where a long-time researcher, William Thompson, confessed (2014) that he and colleagues committed gross fraud in a study of the MMR vaccine.

Thompson admitted the evidence showed the vaccine led to a higher risk of autism in children—but that finding was intentionally buried, and the vaccine was given a free pass.

Of course, mainstream reporters have been mercilessly attacking Vaxxed, and a segment of the population finds it impossible to believe that the CDC would ever commit this kind of fraud.

So, as a mind-changer, let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

The problem was, the CDC was concealing another scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

I’ll add a few details. It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine increasing the risk of autism…you can lay that one to rest.

The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it.

And CBS will conveniently forget how it aided and abetted the CDC, by censoring real news, and instead opted for egregious and titanic fake news.

Source: One more reason never to trust the CDC « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

Posted in corruption, disinformation, media bias, media bias, medical, news media | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shia Lebouf’s “He Will Not Divide Us” Season 3 Has Ended

By Ron Cordova, The Goldwater · 03-10-2017
Photo credit: The Goldwater

“He Will Not Divide Us” Season 3 began on March 8, 2017 with Shia Lebouf setting up a camera pointing towards an HWNDU flag at an unknown location with just a sky as background and the challenge: “[The Flag] will be flown for the duration [of Trump’s presidency]”.

Autists at 8chan’s /hwndu/ board immediately began searching for clues to the whereabouts of the flag. Listening to the local fauna, they were able to guess the biome of the flag. By watching the sun go down, they were able to find the orientation of the flag. At night they were able to see stars in the background and used that to find the general location of the flag. After 3am they then sent out a car who honked his horn at strategic locations to pinpoint the flag by playing “Marco Polo” with 8chan over the video stream.

With this data, they were able to find a few flag poles in the general area by scrutinizing Google Maps. Using the orientation data from earlier, they checked flight paths and were able to predict flights 4-5 minutes before showing up on the live stream. A local autist cross referenced flight data with angles and figured out the exact location of the flag pole.

In the morning, an expedition team was sent out to get recon on the flag. After photographing and confirming the flag, a possible heist went into the planning stage. Some larping ex-military anons gave advice on possible routes and safe exit points to get the flag and get out undetected. Multiple anons then began sending out disinfo to confuse any possible efforts by Shia to stop the flag heist. Unfortunately for Shia, some anons were crouched in the nearby field all night, waiting for an opening.

After watching the patterns of the flag guards carefully, a courageous Anon went over and valiantly removed the HWNDU flag, replacing it with a MAGA hat. The MAGA hat was on the flag pole for 10 minutes before being taken down in pure rage, likely by Shia himself.

The general area of the camera was located in 12 hours, pinpointed in 26 hours, and the flag was stolen within 36 hours.

“A bunch of autists on the internet just committed a meticulously planned nighttime operation against an enemy installation.” -Anon

Source: Shia Lebouf’s “He Will Not Divide Us” Season 3 Has Ended

Posted in liberal intolerance/persecution | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The TOP DOWN push for an Article V convention « Publius-Huldah’s Blog

By Publius Huldah

Ever since, some 50 years ago, the Ford Foundation produced the Constitution for the Newstates of America, it has always been the political elite and the big money who are behind the push for an Article V convention.  Today, people and politicians who posture as men of virtue and “conservatives principles” are being paid to support an Article V convention – e.g. http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-legislature/2017/03/01/major-conservatives-piggy-banks-behind-texas-obsession-amending-constitution

See also, http://le.utah.gov/house2/CofI/IVORYK1.pdf

Anyone who refuses to look into this is willfully blind and morally culpable.

The billionaires who are buying an Article V convention (e.g., Koch Brothers, George Soros), have no intention of limiting the power and jurisdiction of the  government over us!

The propaganda put out by the con-con lobby is able to take root in those who don’t know what our Constitution already says; don’t understand our Founding Principles; and don’t know our History on throwing off governments and setting up new ones.  We’ve already done it twice!

The enemies of our Constitution want to do it a third time.  Since they know you wouldn’t agree to it; they are telling you things which aren’t true.

Listen up:

Our Declaration of Independence says at the 2nd paragraph that a People have the right to throw off their form of government and set up a new one. We invoked that Principle in 1776 to throw off British Rule. We invoked that Principle again in 1787 to throw off the Articles of Confederation and the government it created, and set up a new Constitution [the one we have now] which created a new government.

People who don’t know that are unable to understand that if there is an Article V convention today, the Delegates can do the same thing! Throw off the Constitution we have and set up a new one which creates a new government.

For heavens sake, People! New Constitutions are already written and waiting in the wings for an Article V convention! Here’s one of them – it’s ratified by a national Referendum. The States don’t vote on it. The States are dissolved and replaced by regional governments answerable to the new national government. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/concon/newstates.htm#.WLrJEn98ExE

George Soros wants a Progressive Constitution in place by the year 2020. http://keywiki.org/Constitution_2020

George W. Bush, the Council on Foreign Relations, and others want to move the United States into the North American Union. Canada, the US, and Mexico are to merge and a Parliament set up over them. In order to do this, they need a new Constitution for the US to transform us from a sovereign nation to a member state in the NAU. How do they get a new Constitution? At an Article V convention.  How do they get an Article V convention?  Pay people who pose as conservatives to tell the American People that we need a convention to get amendments which will limit the power of the federal government.

And the people who don’t understand our Founding Principles, don’t know our History, and don’t know what our Constitution already says, fall for the subterfuge.

READ the Task Force Report on the NAU. Heidi Cruz was on the Task Force which wrote the Report:  http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102

Americans! Wake up! You are being scammed and tricked and lied to. And bought and paid for politicians and charlatans are selling you into slavery.

God gave you a brain.  It is wicked for you to refuse to use it.

Source: The TOP DOWN push for an Article V convention « Publius-Huldah’s Blog

Posted in Article V Convention, Constitution | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Repeal the left’s Motor Voter Law

It is breaking up immigrant families

The Usual Suspects of the left are strangely silent as a legal immigrant, a mother of three American-born children, married to an American citizen, faces deportation.  The reasons are twofold.
Margarita Del Pilar Fitzpatrick committed a crime that the left insists never happens: illegal voting by a non-citizen.  Mrs. Fitzpatrick now faces deportation, and separation from her husband and children, unless they can obtain residency in her native Peru, thanks to the left.  The Cook County Record explains:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has denied the application of a Peruvian national to stay in the country, following the discovery that the non-citizen voted twice in federal elections. (snip)
She had been living in the U.S. for three years and applied for a driver’s license in Illinois. During the application process, she had to fill out forms at the Illinois Secretary of State’s driver services facility and used her green card and Peruvian passport as identification. While filling in the forms she admitted that she checked a box on the form claiming she was a citizen of the U.S.
“The form sternly warns aliens not to check that box, and Fitzpatrick does not contend that she has any difficulty in understanding written English,” the court documents state.
On the form there was a checkbox that would allow her to register as a voter. She did so after the clerk inquired whether she wanted to register. She then proceeded to vote for federal officials twice in 2006.
The court emphasized that non-residents were not allowed to vote in elections. There is a statute that allows for the removal of non-citizens who vote in state or federal elections.
The clerk acted in accord with the law, The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) (52 U.S.C. § 20501 – 52 U.S.C. § 20511).  That law, frequently called “Motor Voter,” was pushed by ACORN and was so critical to the left’s strategy for political dominance that both Cloward and Piven attended the signing ceremony, standing behind Bill Clinton as he signed it into law.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick:
… claims that the clerk at the driver services facility told her it was up to her if she checked the box to register to vote. However, the court documents state that what the clerk told her “was a refusal to give advice, not an assurance that it was lawful to register.”
The court record also noted that it is against federal law for state officials to say anything that may discourage an individual applying for a driver’s license from registering to vote.
By terms of the law, the clerk was not able to discourage Mrs. Fitzpatrick from registering to vote, even though it was an illegal act that eventually led to her deportation order.  That created a situation in which she may have felt she had received approval.
In the law, a facility that represents a danger to the public but is accessible is called an “attractive nuisance,” and its owner faces legal liability for damages that result from its availability.  The classic example is an unfenced swimming pool that could lure children to use it and then face danger of injury.
It is clear to me that the Motor Voter Law, a headliner strategic goal of the left, is an attractive nuisance for immigrants, legal and illegal, luring them into felonious behavior that could expel them from the country no matter how deep their family roots have become.
The left is embarrassed by the fate of Mrs. Fitzpatrick.  It is up to conservatives to make her story known and to push for repeal of The National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/repeal_the_lefts_motor_voter_law_it_is_breaking_up_immigrant_families.html

Posted in Vote Fraud | Tagged , | Leave a comment

These New Digital “Shares” Are Turning Pennies Into Millions | International Man

Today, I’m sharing with you a must-read article on the next revolutionary technology that’s flying under the radar right now.

It could soon be a critical tool in your international diversification toolkit… and it could also make you a fortune.

The piece below is from my friend and colleague, Teeka Tiwari—editor of the Palm Beach Confidential.

Teeka is a true expert on this new technology. He has more connections and expertise on this topic than anyone else that I know of. I think you’ll enjoy it.

Until next time,

Nick Giambruno
Senior Editor
International Man


The initial “stock” offering made $7.5 million in a matter of minutes…

SingularDTV is a blockchain-based platform for independent producers and filmmakers.

It uses “smart contracts” that are executed and enforced by computer programs. Users of the content pay its creators directly via these contracts.

This new model virtually eliminates the need for third parties like YouTube and Netflix….

In other words, SingularDTV will give creators full control of their content.

If you want to watch or listen to content on SingularDTV, you’d pay the creator a “token” called SNGLS. A token is like a cryptocurrency. SingularDTV would charge a tiny transaction fee to keep the platform running.

[Think of a token as a digital poker chip. You can store it on your computer or mobile device and cash it in later.]

We don’t know whether SingularDTV will take off. But here’s why we’re telling you its story…

When the venture group behind SingularDTV went public in October 2016… it issued a new type of “share” to fund the startup.

The group raised $7.5 million in cryptocurrency… in less than 10 minutes.

SingularDTV is not the only example.

The blockchain gaming app FirstBlood also issued “shares” when it went public in September 2016. It raised $5.5 million in cryptocurrency… in a few minutes (some reports estimated the money was raised in less than 60 seconds).

It could likely be the fastest crowdsale ever. In fact, the sale went so fast, nearly half the investors who wanted to get in couldn’t.

This new type of market is about to explode… And I’ll show you how you can profit from these revolutionary new “shares”…

 “Digital” Startups Level the Playing Field

Brand-new blockchain ventures are now “going public” with initial coin offerings (ICOs).

These are similar to the stock market’s initial public offerings (IPOs). But the important difference is major Wall Street money has yet to move into the much smaller ICO market.

Here’s why I’m so bullish on this market…

The biggest gains from technology (1,000%, 10,000%, or more) come from investing in private startup companies… before the public at large hears about them.

Think about “unicorns” like Uber, Airbnb, and Dropbox.

[A unicorn is a private startup company with a valuation of more than $1 billion.]

A few years ago, no one would have ever thought about ride sharing (Uber)… peer-to-peer property rental (Airbnb)… or cloud-based storage systems (Dropbox).

Today, these companies have private valuations of:

  • $68 billion (Uber)
  • $25.5 billion (Airbnb)
  • $10 billion (Dropbox).

But only the “big boys” on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley are allowed to invest early in these types of companies.

If you aren’t an accredited investor worth at least $1 million in net assets, you’re out of luck.

That’s all about to change…

The New Way to Invest in a Startup… For Pennies

As I mentioned above, each blockchain runs on its own cryptocurrency (like the new SNGLS token)…

The currencies are “money” that can be spent or saved… but they also act as “shares” for blockchain startups.

As more people use a particular blockchain, its “shares” increase in price.

Unlike most startups that require you to be an accredited investor, anyone can buy “shares” in a blockchain startup. All you have to do is buy its cryptocurrency.

And you can do it for as little as $100…

The Perfect Asymmetric Bet

In November, we used this strategy to buy into a social media blockhain platform. At the time, tokens traded around 12 cents. Today, we’re up more than 45%.

We purchased another blockchain platform (this one’s a gaming app) for a few bucks. It’s now up nearly 130%.

In Palm Beach Confidential, we call these types of trades Asymmetric Bets. They have a vast upside but limited downside.

That’s why I put together an Asymmetric Blockchain Bundle. It’s a way for the little guy to get in on startups with explosive potential. We’ve used our extensive network of industry experts to identify “shares” in these little-known blockchain startups.

A prime example of how this strategy works is bitcoin…

Just $100 invested in bitcoin when it was trading at one penny is worth $7.5 million today.

If you invested $100 when another cryptocurrency we own was trading at 30 cents (that was the initial price)… it would be worth $33,000 today.

My point is this: If you’re looking for life-changing gains, but you don’t want to risk much money… then you need to be involved in this space.

Would you risk $100 per trade over a basket of blockchain startups if even one of them could make you $33,000? I know I would.

Now, there are thousands of startups out there. Most of them are worthless. The best way to own them is to create a basket of several to give you some diversity.

All it takes is for one of them to become a breakout star for you to make gains of 100%, 1,000%, 2,000% or more.

Now, my team and I have researched hundreds of them for you already. And we’ve put only those with the most potential upside in our Palm Beach Confidentialportfolio.

If you’d like to learn more about our cryptocurrencies, click here to watch this video.

But you must act fast… These plays are so tiny we can only open the service to new members for a few hours more. The doors will soon close.

Source: These New Digital “Shares” Are Turning Pennies Into Millions | International Man

Posted in economics | Tagged , | Leave a comment