Meckler admits ‘Convention of States’ won’t solve the problem!

There may not be a question more difficult to answer for Mark Meckler, President of Citizens for Self-Governance and spokesman for its Convention of States Project (COS), than this:

Since the federal government ignores the Constitution as now written, why would it obey an amended Constitution?

This is a fair question, considering COS has spent several years and millions of dollars from undisclosed sources1 on paid lobbyists and “senior advisors” who crisscross the country leaning on legislators to pass resolutions asking Congress to call an Article V convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution, ostensibly to limit the federal government.

All the while, at the local level, COS has been carrying out a massive public relations campaign claiming to be a grassroots movement with a “solution as big as the problem.”

But Meckler’s group has a solution that has nothing to do with the problem! Since the problem is a federal government that has overreached its powers by ignoring our Constitution, logic alone tells us that amending our Constitution, the very document being ignored, can’t possibly fix the problem.

On July 6, 2017 (Part 2 at 37:00), Mark Meckler was heard on Red Eye Radioanswering that question in an interesting and illogical way:

    • A caller asked:

“Once the amendments are proposed and ratified, how are they actually implemented?”

    • In response, Meckler said,

“[The amendments] just automatically become part of the Constitution…part of the structure of governance in America…and that means that government then has to begin operating according to those amendments in the same way that they do with the rest of the Constitution.”

Meckler continued, “And functionally, ultimately that means government will shrink, they will have the authority to do less. And if they fail to follow those amendments, then obviously, there is litigation that ensues up to the federal courts and ultimately up to the Supreme Court, if necessary.” (emphasis added)

But wait! COS has contended for years that the Constitution needs to be amended precisely because of decisions by activist judges who have undermined the original intent of the Constitution and allowed the federal government to usurp powers not delegated by our Constitution.

In other words, Meckler gives us a circular argument. He’s saying that COS will add more verbiage to the Constitution to counter activist judges; and then, when the federal government ignores the new wording, as they have in the past, there will be lawsuits to force the government to follow the original intent of the framers. And lawsuits generate still more decisions by activist judges!

It should be noted, too, that our Constitution already limits the federal government to its enumerated powers; and any changes such as a Balanced Budget Amendmentwill expand the power of the federal government.

State governments already have the power to resist unconstitutional acts of the federal government – they simply need a backbone!

Another caller, only 10 minutes later, hit upon the circular argument and got a different response from Meckler:

    • Caller:

“What happens, if say, we call a “convention of states” [and] we get some great reform amendments made to the Constitution to undo a lot of damage that has been done by activist judges and left-wing congressional majorities and presidents. What happens if we have future…laws…that violate the new amendments…and…new activist judges on the Supreme Court that then give rubber stamp approval [to the unconstitutional laws]…. Is there a bullet-proof, really good way to stop the same process from cycling over and over again after we get new amendments [at a convention]?”

    • Meckler:

“You know, I think that’s one of the best questions there is. And I’m going to give you the short and blunt answer, which is NO!”

That’s right, Mark Meckler asserts there is no way to stop the federal government from ignoring amendments proposed by a convention that later become ratified! And the entire process places our current Constitution at risk – for what?!

    • Meckler elaborated philosophically:

“There is no way to prevent the cycle from happening because the cycle is the cycle of human nature. In our history, you can go back to the Roman Empire and look at what happens…. So I think what happens is, you correct course, you put the ship on course, and eventually it will begin to be blown off course.

“History tells us it takes about 100 years for amendments to stop being effective…I think, for example, the first amendment about 100 years ago started to come under assault. So, it had been in place for well over 100 years; so I expect the slide to happen.”

Let’s get this straight. The convention lobby is pouring massive resources into putting our Constitution at risk in a convention because Mark Meckler is trying to steer the ship back on course, somehow predicting that in 100 years our children’s descendants will need to go through the same process, subjecting our Constitution to risk once again (assuming it survives the second federal convention he is trying so hard to invoke). Why hasn’t he, his lobbyists, or his “senior advisors” brought thisup at legislative hearings?

Why not work on enforcing the Constitution we have, instead of rewriting 2,000 annotated pages of Supreme Court decisions, and very probably the entire Constitution? Why not encourage our State Legislators to stand up against and refuse to comply with unconstitutional federal dictates NOW – that’s what they are supposed to do, according to our Framers.

Article V was meant to correct DEFECTS in the Constitution, and this explains why it is not a solution for reining in an overreaching federal government.

If the main COS proponent thinks his “Solution” is a temporary “fix” and his method of implementing Amendments resulting from an Article V convention is no different than the system that created the problem in the first place, one must wonder…

What is the real reason COS is being bankrolled to advance an Article V convention whose Delegates, as direct Representatives of the People, would have the inherent right “to alter or to abolish” our “Form of Government”? (Declaration of Independence, paragraph 2.)

Endnote:

1 While we are unable to determine all the sources of the funding for Meckler’s group. The ultimate source of much of the funding for the push for an Article V convention is the mega billionaire Koch brothers of Texas.

© Judi Caler

Source: Meckler admits ‘Convention of States’ won’t solve the problem!

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

NPR and Harvard Say: Obamacare Is a Complete Failure | Power Line

National Public Radio collaborated with Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to survey Americans’ recent experience with health care. As to the Affordable Care Act, the survey’s findings are damning. They suggest that Obamacare has been worse than a complete waste of money.

This is the survey’s only question directly on Obamacare. Most respondents say that Obamacare hasn’t affected them; where it has affected them, most say the law’s impact has been harmful:

Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 6.21.03 PM

The promises that President Obama made about the ACA–cheaper premiums! lower co-pays and deductibles! better coverage!–have completely failed to materialize. This isn’t a surprise, of course, but it is nice to see it so copiously documented:

Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 6.24.29 PM

Remember how we were all supposed to save $2,500 a year in health insurance premiums? Only 4% say they have saved anything, and those respondents are probably wrong. For the vast majority, Obamacare has either done nothing, or has increased the cost of health care, counting premiums, deductibles and co-pays. Good going, Barry!

The federal government has had its share of failures over the years, but it is hard to think of a federal program that has proved such a comprehensive disaster, in such a short period of time, as the Affordable Care Act. Which, by the way, still hasn’t been fully implemented, as the Democrats have postponed some of its more baleful effects until 2017. So the number of people who are hurt by Obamacare, e.g. by losing the employer-based coverage with which they were content, is destined to rise.

Source: NPR and Harvard Say: Obamacare Is a Complete Failure | Power Line

Posted in Barrack Obama, Obama | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ben Carson has uncovered half a trillion dollars in bookkeeping errors in Obama’s HUD ⋆ Powdered Wig Society

So, where is the money?

Ben Carson has revealed massive incompetence and possibly corruption in Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development, with over half a trillion dollars improperly accounted for.

The inspector general (IG) for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) revealed this week that for three straight years, Obama’s HUD staff cooked the books. These morons wouldn’t know a balance sheet from a fitted sheet, reports Blacksphere.

HUD’s books are in such bad shape that the IG can’t complete an audit on their second try.

Here’s what happened on the first try:

According to the IG report, after the first review, Obama staffers had to correct a whopping $520 billion in bookkeeping errors.

When the IG remained unable to issue an opinion for fiscal years 2015 or 2016, he gave Obama staffers a three-month extension. Thus, their reprieve allowed them to fix $3.4 billion in 2015 errors and $516.4 billion in 2016 errors.

After HUD’s re-submission of paperwork, 11 material weaknesses, seven significant deficiencies, and five instances of failure to comply with laws and regulations remained unresolved.

The continued problems “were due to an inability to establish a compliant control environment, implement adequate financial accounting systems, retain key financial staff, and identify appropriate accounting principles and policies,” the IG said.

If the Obama team hired qualified staff, the unresolved issues below would already be resolved:

  • HUD lawyers repeatedly refusing to sign a management letter listing all HUD litigation
  • HUD’s improper accounting methods
  • Failure to correctly measure assets and liabilities
  • Discrepancies between general ledger and sub-ledger accounts
  • Lack of sufficient support for an audit of $4.2 billion in loan assets from Ginnie Mae’s financial statements.

The Fix was simple. Obama’s HUD needed to “comply with generally accepted accounting principles.”

Obama HUD FraudYet, Obama’s HUD lackey, Brian Sullivan said otherwise.

In December 2016 he claimed:

“HUD does apply generally accepted accounting standards,” despite the IG report that we do not.

Ironically, Senate Democrats rushed to condemn Dr. Ben Carson, the former neurosurgeon who President Trump tapped to be his new HUD Secretary. Further, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) argued:

“I have serious concerns about Dr. Carson’s lack of expertise and experience in dealing with housing issues. Someone who is as anti-government as him is a strange fit for Housing secretary, to say the least,” Schumer said in a statement. 

And House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called Carson a “disconcerting and disturbingly unqualified choice.”

As we say of Leftists, they accuse you of what they are.

Dr. Ben Carson is undoubtedly qualified to run HUD or anything else in the government. Now the distinguished doctor must clean up billions of dollars in sloppy accounting left undone by his predecessors.

However, the real question may be, “Where’s the money?”

Regardless, you can bet that Dr. Carson and President Trump will follow the money.

Source: Ben Carson has uncovered half a trillion dollars in bookkeeping errors in Obama’s HUD ⋆ Powdered Wig Society

Posted in Barrack Obama, corruption, Obama | Tagged | Leave a comment

South Carolina Killer Could Be a Left-Winger | www.independentsentinel.com

The left wing immediately politicized the murder of 9 black worshippers at a prayer service in South Carolina. It suddenly wasn’t about the killer or the victims, it was about the weapon he chose to use and those awful right wingers, the South, white people, and Fox News.

The left online blogs, following Obama’s lead, jumped on this case to promote their gun agenda and stir anger in the black community. They are falsely claiming the right jumped on it first which is patently untrue.

The fact is that Obama was the first to come out and politicize this killing with Hillary a close second along with the left wing media.

The left wing is condemning all Conservatives, whites, Fox News and southerners, but what if the killer is a left winger?

The New York Times posted a story today about the murderer and said he “worked in landscaping and seemed to live an itinerant life, sometimes sleeping in his car. In recent weeks his behavior turned more bizarre, as he talked about wanting to burn an American flag and get his neck tattooed with the word ‘dagger.’”

roof

I never met a Conservative who burned the U.S. flag. That’s a leftist thing. A friend of his, however, said he had strong conservative beliefs and was very proud of being from the south. He was a segregationist who wanted to start a civil war.

The leftists are generally the ones who want a race war. The New Black Panthers and The Nation of Islam, respectively, have called for a race war or told their followers to prepare for a race war. You get crickets from the media when they make their threats.

Stereotyping is useful to promote their agenda but it doesn’t reflect reality.

Roof appears to have used a stolen gun by his own admission, but the left seems to believe that keeping guns from legal gun owners will also keep mass killers from stealing them and from killing people. There is no gun law that would have prevented this killing but if one of the parishioners was armed, that person could have stopped the killing.

To eliminate the Second Amendment, the left knows they have to discredit or destroy the right wing who support it.

Take the Colorado theater shooter as an example. The left presented the case as one of a mentally deranged man.

Salon, in April of this year, described him as a psychotic and they went on a campaign condemning the mental health system. They didn’t mention his Progressive politics.

When it came to the South Carolina killing on the other hand, a Salon writer said all white people are guilty. Sarcastically and childishly, the writer asked the questions normally asked about black gang crime, such as:

Is something wrong with the white family?

Where are the white fathers in the white home?

When will white leadership step up and stop white right-wing domestic terrorism?

Is White American culture pathological? Why is White America so violent?

The writer said, “In the aftermath of recurring mass shooting events, and right-wing domestic terrorism, it is essential that [white Americans] start to practice such acts of introspection in the interest of the Common Good.”

It wasn’t just Salon, it was all online leftist outlets.

One city councilman who was a friend of one of the murdered pastors said the killer was watching too much Fox News with no basis in fact.

Dylann Roof truly was a racist and a terrorist, but the left wing, because they believe he was a right winger, wants you to believe he is also completely sane and they want you to believe he was a loyal southern Conservative guided by Fox News.

As it turns out, he’s not left or right, he’s a white supremacist and got the idea when George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin. He googled and came up with a conservative site that posts crimes of blacks and whites and decided his mission would be to save the world from inferior blacks. He had other biases according to the NY Times. He posted selfies with confederate flags on a website he owned. The photos show an emotionless person with dead eyes. Along with the photos was a long, rambling manifesto that would do the KKK proud.

While there is little said about the leftist mass murderers, they far outnumber any right wing maniacs.

The Columbine shooters’ parents were Progressive liberals; the Virginia Tech shooter was a registered Democrat who sent hate mail to George Bush; the Colorado theater killer was a registered Democrat who worked on the Obama campaign; the Connecticut school shooter was a registered Democrat who hated Christians. Ted “Ted” Kaczynski and Malik Hasan Nadal were Progressive liberals. The Hollywood killer was a Hollywood Progressive. Domestic terrorists of the past have been Democrats with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn being the most notable.

Whether Roof is right or left is irrelevant. He’s a madman, perhaps a sociopath, and he is a racist who used drugs and who needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law in what is a truly horrific case. What we should care about are the victims.

Meanwhile, the wonderful people who were victimized by this monster are forgiving him left and right. They are the real black people, not these loons who take money from George Soros’ MORE so they can protest and riot. These are the God-fearing, kindly people who make up the majority of the black community.

Listen to this heartbroken daughter forgive her mother’s killer.

Hillary Clinton is running around trying to tie this into illegal immigration, race hustler Marc Lamont Hill is blaming it on white supremacy but they aren’t showing concern for these people and their families.

All that matters is the families of those innocent people.

victims of Dylann Roof

Source: South Carolina Killer Could Be a Left-Winger | www.independentsentinel.com

Posted in gun control, liberal intolerance/persecution | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Basic Computer Skills: How to Set Up a Wi-Fi Network – Full Page

The Internet is a really powerful tool. It gives us access to all kinds of information at a moment’s notice—think email, Google search, and Wikipedia. So there’s something a little counterintuitive about only being able to use the Internet when you sit down at a desktop computer. What if you could use the Internet from anywhere in your home or office?

If you already have high-speed (broadband) Internet service at your house, it’s pretty easy to create your own home wireless network. Commonly known as Wi-Fi, a wireless network allows you to connect laptops, smartphones, and other mobile devices to your home Internet service without an Ethernet cable.

Purchase a wireless router

a wireless router

To create your own Wi-Fi network, you’ll need a wireless router. This is the device that will broadcast the Wi-Fi signal from your Internet modem throughout your house. Your Internet service provider (ISP) may offer you a wireless router for a small monthly fee. If you’ve never set up a Wi-Fi network before, this may be the easiest option.

If you want to buy your own router, we’d recommend spending a little more time researching different options. PC Mag offers a comprehensive guide on How to Buy a Wireless Router.

Some Internet modems may already have a built-in wireless router, which means you won’t need to purchase a separate one.

Connect the cables

connecting the cables for a wi-fi router
  1. Once you’ve acquired a wireless router, you’ll need to connect it to your existing Internet modem.
  2. Connect an Ethernet cable from your modem to the wireless router (there is usually a short Ethernet cable included with your wireless router for this purpose).
  3. Plug in the power cable for the wireless router.
  4. Wait at least 30 to 60 seconds, and make sure the lights on your router are working correctly.

Configure your router

Next, you’ll need to use your computer to configure your router’s default settings. This includes setting a unique name and password for your wireless network.

  1. Using your web browser, enter the router’s default IP address into the address bar, then press Enter. Your router’s instructions should include this information, but some of the most common addresses include 192.168.0.1192.168.1.1, and 192.168.2.1.
  2. The router’s sign-in page will appear. Again, the exact sign-in details should be included with your router’s instructions, but most routers use a standard user name and password combination, such as admin and password.
  3. Your router’s settings page will appear. Locate and select the Network Namesetting, then enter a unique network name.
  4. Locate and select the Network Password setting, and choose an Encryption option. There are several types of encryption you can use, but we recommend WPA2, which is generally considered to be the most secure.
  5. Enter your desired password. Make sure to use a strong password to help ensure no one else can access your network.
  6. Locate and select the Save button to save your settings.

Connect!

That’s it! Now you’re ready to connect to your Wi-Fi network and make sure it’s working. The process for connecting to a Wi-Fi network will vary slightly depending on what type of computer or device you’re using, but any system will require these basic steps.

  1. Locate your computer’s network settings, and search for nearby Wi-Fi networks.
  2. Select your network, and enter your password.
  3. If the connection is successful, open your web browser and try navigating to a webpage like www.google.com. If the page loads, it means your Wi-Fi connection is working correctly.

Congratulations!

You’ve just set up your own home wireless network. Way to go!

Source: Basic Computer Skills: How to Set Up a Wi-Fi Network – Full Page

Posted in science and technology | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Silencing Reports About Muslim Rapists Is Sweden’s Suicide

(Shutterstock)

I could be writing every week about Sweden. Every day. Every hour. For reasons that will be analyzed by historians for a long, long time – provided the Western world doesn’t become so thoroughly Islamized that the possibility of objective historical scrutiny is utterly obliterated – the Swedes have chosen a path of cultural and societal suicide that puts all other countries in the shade.

For anyone curious about self-destructive psychopathologies, it is a grimly fascinating phenomenon. Why, of all places, Sweden? How can a Swedish woman raped by an illegal Muslim immigrant be so bursting with racial guilt that she hesitates to report the crime to the police for fear that her report might lead to her rapist’s punishment or deportation? Or, more generally, because news of the offense might result in an increase in “Islamophobia?”

This is the kind of madness that’s going on in Sweden now. More than any other country in Europe, it has a government and a media that are in denial about the truth, a legal system that punishes those who dare to tell the truth, and a people who have been brainwashed for decades with the vile lie that they have a moral obligation to hand their country over to hostile, despotic strangers from far away.

No, Sweden isn’t North Korea. The ugly news does get out, one way or another. Some of it, anyway. It’s just that, with extremely rare exceptions, the important facts about the nation’s disastrous Islamization don’t find their way into the country’s own mainstream media. On the contrary, Sweden’s major TV, radio, and print outlets are notorious for the fidelity with which they parrot the government line and omit or whitewash uncomfortable news developments.

No, if you’re looking for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about most of the nasty stuff going on in Sweden these days, you’re better off checking out Swedish websites such as Avpixlat and Fria Tider, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Postenand two Norwegian sites: document.no and rights.no, the latter being the site of the organization Human Rights Service.

I’ve previously quoted a March 11 Jyllands-Posten editorial that spelled out the Swedish situation quite frankly: what should “most worry Sweden’s neighbors,” the Danish editors wrote, is the Swedes’ “unwillingness to openly and honestly discuss the government-approved multicultural idyll. … In the long run, the mendacity that characterizes the Swedish debate cannot be maintained. The discrepancy between the official, idealized version of Sweden, ‘the people’s home,’ and the brutal reality that everyone can see has simply become too great.”

Indeed. This is a country where rapes by Muslim men are systematically ignored by the authorities or responded to with minimal punishment. Routinely, Swedish courts refuse to return these monsters – some of whom have repeatedly subjected small boys and girls to violent sexual abuse – to their home countries for fear that they’ll be put in danger. In other words, Swedish judges care more about the safety of foreign rapists than that of Swedish children.

(No wonder U.S. News and World Report has just named Sweden the best country in the world to be an immigrant. Yet another cockeyed ranking. The proper question isn’t which country is best for immigrants, but which country has the most sensible immigration policy.)

It’s a country where even prominent Swedish feminists – fanatical boosters of multiculturalism – are now moving out of Muslim-heavy neighborhoods not only because of the Muslim rapists but because of the Muslim “morality police,” who are less concerned with monitoring rapists than with controlling women’s conduct. (One such feminist organized “coffee shop meetings” with Muslim male community leaders in an attempt to resolve the situation, but gave up.)

It’s a country where the government rolls out the red carpet for returning ISIS members, giving them special benefits, in hopes that they’ll see the light and put down their weapons.

It’s a country where, while Muslim rapists and terrorists are forgiven, critics of immigrant conduct are punished. In May, a 70-year-old woman in Dalarna, Sweden, was arrested for writing on Facebook in 2015 about immigrants who “set cars on fire and urinate and defecate in the streets.” (She faces up to four years in prison.)

No surprise, then, that on July 7, Jyllands-Posten reported that the Swedish government plans to alter the nation’s Constitution in such a way as to give itself the power to limit online free speech about precisely these ticklish matters. Among other things, wrote Jyllands-Posten, it will become illegal “for certain websites to publicize information about private persons’ ethnicity or conviction of crimes.”

Of course: the best way to address the ever-rising tide of Muslim criminality is to close down every last media outlet that reports honestly about it. The mainstream Swedish media are already playing ball; it’s just a few recalcitrant websites that need to be scrubbed clean. Presumably the next step will be to block access in Sweden to Jyllands-Posten and other foreign news sources that tell Swedes the truth about what’s going on within their own borders.

Then everything will be just perfect, no? And what are the chances that no matter how much Sweden tightens its already alarming (if currently tacit) limits on freedom of speech, Reporters without Borders will keep Sweden at its ridiculous #2 spot on the World Press Freedom Index?

Source: Silencing Reports About Muslim Rapists Is Sweden’s Suicide

Posted in Islam | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

6.9 million multiple voters in 28 states, report finds – Watchdog.org

6/25/14

By Kenric Ward | Watchdog.org

RICHMOND, Va. — Some 6.9 million Americans are registered to vote in two or more states, according to a report obtained by Watchdog.org.

“Our nation’s voter rolls are a mess,” says Catherine Engelbrecht, president of the election-watch group True The Vote.

“Sensible approaches to roll maintenance are fought tooth and nail by radical special interests who can use the duplicity in the system to their advantage,” she said.

The latest interstate voter cross check tallied 6,951,484 overlapping voter registrations, and they’re just the tip of the iceberg.

The cross-check program involves only 28 states and does not include the three largest: California, Texas and Florida.

“Duplicate registration is an open invitation to voting fraud,” said Clara Belle Wheeler, a member of the Election Board in Albemarle County, Va. “This ability to vote more than once dilutes the legal votes and changes the results of elections.”

The interstate cross-check program matches first and last names and dates of birth to identify multiple registrations.But the data are not routinely used to purge duplicates.

“Increasingly lax standards in our election process produce increasingly unreliable results,” Engelbrecht asserted.

“The few conversations that are had about how to shore up these weaknesses are immediately seized on by certain politicians and special-interest groups as fuel to further divide American voters based on trumped-up race and class-based narratives,” she said.

Engelbrecht said the “vicious cycle” can be fixed “if citizens wake up, stand up and refuse to settle for a broken system.”

Jay DeLancy, executive director of the Voter Integrity Project of North Carolina, says the solution is as simple as one-two-three.

“First, tie registrations more closely to (each state’s) Department of Motor Vehicles. All voter ID cards would originate there,” he explained.

“As is today, when we get an ID card from DMV, we get registered to vote — but turning in your former state’s ID card should revoke your right to vote in the state that issued it.

“Second, make it a felony to possess a voter ID card — or any other DMV-issued ID card — from more than one state.

“Third, we would only be allowed to vote from the address on that ID card. If a voter shows up with the wrong address, the vote is provisional until the card is corrected,” DeLancy concluded.

He added: “We don’t need a federal ID card to do this. In fact, it wouldn’t require any more feds to be hired.”

States, however, will have to tighten up. And that could be a challenge — both politically and fiscally.

In Virginia, Wheeler noted that the State Board of Elections and Department of Elections “have had their funding reduced greatly by the (Terry) McAuliffe administration.” McAuliffe is a Democrat.

“With reduced funding, they have a grossly limited staff and thus, will be greatly limited in the ability to do the cross checks and reduce voter fraud.”

SBE officials, who provided the cross-check data in response to a Freedom of Information Act filing by the Virginia Voters Alliance, did not respond to Wheeler’s assertion.

Watchdog previously reported Virginia and Maryland have 44,000 duplicate voters between them.

Two national voting-rights groups — the League of Women Voters and America Votes — did not respond to Watchdog’s requests for comment.

Kenric Ward is a national correspondent for Watchdog.org and chief of its Virginia Bureau. Contact him at kenric@watchdogvirginia.org or at (571) 319-9824. @Kenricward

Source: 6.9 million multiple voters in 28 states, report finds – Watchdog.org

Posted in Vote Fraud | Tagged | Leave a comment