Prepare And Be Calm

By Marilyn M Barnewall|October 18th, 2020

By Marilyn M. Barnewall

If the indicators are accurate, what is coming is not going to be pleasant.

What you do about it and whether you will come through it will be largely dependent on two things:  your attitude and knowledge of what is happening, why it is happening and what to do about it.

There is a reality the middle class needs to deal with:  You are the target of all of the attacks that have occurred since the Kennedy assassination.  The reason you are the target is that an oligarchy like communism, socialism or a monarchy requires a social order made up of two classes:  The elite and the workers.  These forms of government cannot function with a middle class that has upward mobility.  Thus, as long as there is a middle class, there can be no world government.

You can blame anyone you want for what has, is, and will be happening to American citizens in the near future… what is yet to come will be a first for all of us.  The truth is, the problems we now face have been brewing for over 100 years.  It is like a pimple that, when filled with puss, finally bursts.  The question is, who do you want as President of the United States to clean up the poison?

In many ways, we the people allowed what’s going to happen, but when we elected Donald Trump to clean the swamp we had no idea that corruption could be so deep and infectious.  We didn’t know it would permeate the entire government (including the Department of Justice and our intelligence agencies).  We didn’t know that a political party would literally risk the safety and welfare of the entire nation to fulfill its power needs.

Power needs?  Indeed!  They need enough power to prevent the swamp from being cleaned.  They are part of the manure to be removed.  There are elected officials from both political parties who are part of that muck

If you’re still voting for those who have been in Washington, D.C. for many years you are totally out of touch with reality.  If it’s because you’re on drugs or have a mental disorder, you have my sympathy and prayers.  Anyone who has been in Washington D.C. more than 12 years needs to go home.  These are the people who have caused the problems.  Anyone who thinks re-electing politicians who created the problems so they can become millionaires will solve those problems is out of touch with reality.

Did you think cleaning the swamp would be easy – or popular?  Did you really believe that when you took time for football games, bowling, television, and a hundred other privileges that it would have a positive effect on a government that kept growing and getting deeper and deeper in debt?

Have you been involved in government?  Or did you sit back and let others take care of things?  Most people have done the latter and it’s gotten us knee-deep in bad stuff.

Anyone with a conscience knows we bear responsibility for today’s problems.  We re-elected to office the same fools who wanted more and more debt and who used debt to create a welfare class dependent on government for survival. Re-electing fools to office is largely what caused people to withdraw from the entire process.  We ignored it.  We enjoyed all of the free time we got by ignoring our over-spending government.

Besides, what can one person do?  Your primary job as a citizen of this country is to find and help good people get elected to public office.  How much of that have you been doing?

We are now about to pay the price for that and you will likely blame everyone but yourself.

While I don’t agree with everything Donald Trump has done, while I dislike some of his self-aggrandizing mannerisms, we could not have a better President to lead us at this particular moment in time.

Donald Trump is tougher than Ronald Reagan and has better insight into how to run government like a business.  He had a sharp learning curve at first on the differences between running a business and running a government, but he learned.  It would have been helpful had he been able to trust White House staff… but the FBI made sure General Flynn was removed from White House access early in the game.

Though Trump seems self-aggrandizing, he has personally and secretly helped too many people about whom we have never heard for that to be true.  It is far easier to hear and see Donald Trump as an arrogant jerk and let the mainstream media win its stupid little game.  They tell you nothing called “news” or “truth.”  They lie.  It is their mission to discredit Donald Trump.

Anyone who watched the differences between the Biden “Town Hall” and the attacks against Trump by what was supposed to be a mediator at his “Town Hall” knows that.

Trump has access to the media so he talks about achievements – and it sounds self-aggrandizing.  It isn’t.  It’s a Trump newscast.  He only gets about one in five things he’s achieved made public, but it’s better than none.  You’d hear nothing about it if the media had its way.  He tells you what his administration is doing.  By acting like a braggart, he ensures the media will cover it.  It’s an opportunity for them to portray the President in a negative way… as a braggart.  He knows they won’t resist that!

We’ve had tough times in 2020 and I believe they are going to get worse.

People who have lived in poverty will deal with what’s coming better than those who think not having a meal because there isn’t enough food can’t happen in America.  There is no faster way to learn humility than hunger.  Well, perhaps when your life is truly threatened and you realize you are human you become humble pretty quickly.

So how do you prep to survive?

First, there is no way to prepare for everything.  Too many men I know think because they have numerous weapons and a garage full of ammo they will be able to defend their homes and families.  In many cases they will.  If a group of 15 or 20 attack, however, you might want to re-think that.  Or, if Antifa plays its usual game, they will throw bottles with kerosene and a lit cloth wick in them through your windows.  They’ve done it to others.

Let’s say you’re lucky and don’t get physically attacked.  Let’s say the seditionists who have been attacking our cities for so long decide to knock off an electric grid.  How prepared to live without electricity are you?

Electricity provides more than light… it is access to water (if the water department doesn’t have electricity, how can they purify water and get it to you?).  How do you cook without water?  How do you flush your toilets without water?  How do you stay hydrated without water?  How much extra water do you have at your house?

When I speak here about the need for a good water filter, I’m not talking about a filtration system for your house – no electricity means no water in house pipes.  I am talking about survival filtration so you can go to a local lake or stream and get a bucket or two.

What about light?  How well prepared are you to deal with darkness?  I personally got three very bright lights and each runs on AA batteries for more hours than I will need them.

Why AA?  I bought rechargeable AA batteries.  With no electricity how can I charge them?  Each battery has a USB connector.  I can remove one end of each battery and plug the USB connector into a charger or a computer — or a special appliance that comes with the batteries to charge them.  Anything with a USB port will serve as a charger.  Best of all, I got a solar-powered charger that charges not just my AA batteries, but my cell phone and computer as well.  Yes, I said solar-powered charger… it doesn’t need electricity.  It just needs the sun.  So my lights, my cell phone and my laptop can be kept charged in an emergency.  The batteries can be charged 500 times.

The truth is, with the uncertainties of today’s world, we should all be more prepared for an emergency than any of us are.  To get the very basics is not that costly — at least not if you shop at the right places.  The links above are all to a place called 4 Patriots in Nashville, TN.  That’s where I bought my things.  I am not making a recommendation, I’m just telling you what I found after doing a great deal of research.  I like their products and once when I got something that didn’t work for me I returned it.  They immediately provided a refund to my credit card.  No questions asked.  So I like them.

The point is, you need to find a good supply base — or use mine if you choose.

This could be a book – and if you’ve done no prepping you may need a book.  The point I’m making is that by asking yourself a few easy questions you can quickly and inexpensively be prepared and stop worrying about what may or may not happen.  Ask yourself the same questions I asked you above.  Do an inventory:  Do you have paper plates?  Paper towels?  Sanitizer?  Clorox?  If store shelves are any indication, most people have enough toilet paper.  Make a list of necessities and stock up.

What happens if you don’t have electricity? (Without electricity your credit/debit cards won’t work so have cash on hand.)

How will you get water?

How will you stay warm?

How will you cook food?

How much Spam or other canned meat do you have?

What will happen to your freezer full of food if there is no electricity?

What is your security plan during daytime and at night?

If you have trouble, how can you let your neighbors know so they can prepare and possibly help?

The fact is, if you live in hurricane or earthquake country, these are questions you already should have asked and answered for yourself.  Many people, however, expect someone will always be around to make sure they are safe and fed.  In the good old days that may have been true.  It no longer is.

The whole point of this article is to point out that we are living in the NEW NOW of Black Lives Matter, Antifa and other hate or terrorist groups and politicians too weak or committed to a narrative to deal with them.

Use your common sense.  None but the richest of us can afford all we want, but we can put sub-categories under the questions I posed above and have access to the things we need.  Electricity, for example, is very important to me because I’m on oxygen at night.  I need to buy a battery-powered generator — or learn to sleep sitting up.

Be ready… as ready as you can be.  Then understand that God has His own plans.  If you are a believer the Lord no matter the outcome will care for you.

© 2020 Marilyn Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Marilyn Barnewall:


Posted in BLM black lives matter, Collectivism, Communism, Deep State, guns, leftist bullying, Marxism, New World Order, social engineering, Socialism | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript

Below is an unofficial transcript of Reiner Fuellmich’s Crimes Against Humanity speech. Please excuse any errors regarding the German. Thank you to JF in the UK for sharing this with our John Stone.

Hello. I am Reiner Fuellmich and I have been admitted to the bar in Germany and in California for 26 years.

I have been practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent corporations such as Deutsche bank, formerly one of the world’s largest and most respected banks, today one of the most toxic criminal organisations in the world; VW, one of the world’s largest and most respected car manufacturers, today notorious for its giant diesel fraud; and Cunard and Niagara the world’s largest shipping company. We’re suing them in a multi-million-dollar bribery case.

I’m also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. Since July 10, 2020, this committee has been listening to a large number of international scientists and experts’ testimony – to find answers to questions about the corona crisis which more and more people worldwide are asking.

All the above mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by the German corporations pale in comparison in view of the extent of the damage that the corona crisis has caused and continues to cause.

This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a corona scandal; and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages.

On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity, or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And, for this reason, I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever – the corona fraud scandal – which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.

Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg trials after World War II, that is when they dealt with the main war criminals of the Third Reich. Crimes against humanity are today regulated in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal are:

1. Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test pandemic, specifically does a positive PCR test result mean that the person tested is infected with COVID-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the COVID-19 infection?

2. Do the so-called anti-corona measures such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing and quarantine regulations serve to protect the world’s population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make people panic – so that they believe without asking any questions that their lives are in danger, so that in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?

3. Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied more, so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic?

Dr Christian Drosten, virologist and Director of the Institute at Charité Hospital in Berlin; Mr Lothar Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI;  and Mr Tedros Adhanom, head of the World Health Organisation or WHO, because Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world – for its strict and of course successful adherence to the corona measures?

Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world and certainly not here in Germany; but the anti-corona measures whose only basis are the PCR test results (which are in turn all based on the German Drosten test) have in the meantime caused the loss of innumerable human lives, and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide.

In Australia, for example, people are thrown into prison if they do not wear a mask or do not wear it properly as deemed by the authorities. In the Philippines, people who do not wear a mask, or do not wear it properly in this sense, are getting shot in the head.

Let me first give you a summary of the facts that they present, as they present themselves. Today the most important thing in a lawsuit is to establish the facts; that is, to find out what actually happened. This is because the application of the law always depends on the facts at issue. If I want to prosecute someone for fraud, I cannot do that by presenting the facts of a car accident. So, what happened here regarding the alleged corona pandemic?

The facts laid out below are to a large extent the result of the work of the corona investigative committee. This committee was founded on July 10th by four lawyers in order to determine through hearing expert testimony of international scientists and other experts:

How dangerous is the virus really?

What is the significance of a post-positive PCR test?

What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures both with respect to the world’s population’s health, and with respect to the world’s economy?

Let me start with a little bit of background information: what happened in May 2019 and then in early 2020, and what happened 12 years earlier with the swine flu, which many of you may have forgotten about.

In May of 2019, the stronger of the two parties which govern Germany in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a congress on global health, apparently at the instigation of important players from the pharmaceutical industry and in the tech industry.

At this congress the usual suspects (you might say) gave their speeches. Angela Merkel was there and the German secretary of health, Jens Spahn, but some other people whom one would not necessarily expect to be present at such a gathering were also there. Professor Drosten, virologist, from the Charite hospital in Berlin; Professor Wieler, veterinarian, and head of the RKI (the German equivalent of the CDC) as well as Mr Tadros Adhanom, philosopher, and head of the world health organisation (WHO). They all gave speeches there.

Also present and giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the world’s two largest health funds, namely, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Welcome Trust. Less than a year later these very people called the shots in the proclamation of the worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that mass PCR tests were used to prove mass infections with COVID-19 all over the world, and are now pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide.

These infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered, in turn became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing and mandatory face masks. It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier. Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a disease that spread worldwide and which led to many serious illnesses and deaths. Suddenly, and for reasons never explained, it was supposed to be a worldwide disease, only, many serious illnesses and many deaths were not required anymore, to announce a pandemic.

Due to this change the WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines were produced and sold worldwide, on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret until today.

These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu and never became the horrific plague that the pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn into, with millions of deaths certain to happen, if people didn’t get vaccinated. These vaccines also led to serious health problems: about 700 children in Europe fell incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled.

The vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers’ money had to be destroyed, with even more taxpayers’ money.

Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist Drosten was one of those who stirred up panic in the population; repeating over and over again that the swine flu would claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths, all over the world. In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and his efforts as a member of the German Bundestag and also a member of the Council of Europe, that this hoax was brought to an end, before it would lead to even more serious consequences.

Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an epidemic situation of national importance which is the German equivalent of a pandemic, in March of 2020, and based on this, the lockdown – with the suspension of all essential constitutional rights for an unforeseeable time. There was only one single opinion on which the federal government in Germany based its’ decision. In an outrageous violation of the universally accepted principle audiator at ultra parse, which means that one must also hear the other side. The only person they listened to was Mr Drosten, that is, the very person whose horrific panic-inducing prognosis had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier.

We know this because a whistle-blower named David Siva, a member of the green party, told us about it. He did so first on 29 August, 2020 in Berlin in the context of an event at which Robert F Kennedy Junior also took part, and at which both men gave speeches; and he did so afterwards in one of the sessions of our corona committee.

The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly sceptical about the official narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media. He had therefore undertaken an effort to find out about other scientists’ opinions and had found them on the internet. There he realised that there were a number of highly renowned scientists who held a completely different opinion which contradicted the horrific prognosis of Mr Drosten. They assumed, and still do assume, that there was no disease that went beyond the gravity of the seasonal flu; that the population had already acquired cross or T-cell immunity against this allegedly new virus; and that there was therefore no reason for any special measures and certainly not for vaccinations.

These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in California, a specialist in statistics and epidemiology as well as public health, and at the same time the most quoted scientists in the world; Professor Michael Levitt, Nobel prize winner for chemistry, and also a biophysicist at Stanford University, the German Professors Karin Mulling, Sucharit Bhakdi, Klud Wittkowski as well as Stefan Homburg and now many, many, more scientists and doctors worldwide; including Dr Mike Yeadon. Dr Mike Yeadon is the former vice president and scientific director of Pfizer, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. I will talk some more about him a little later.

At the end of March, beginning of April, of 2020 Mr Sieber turned to the leadership of his green party with the knowledge he had accumulated and suggested that they present these other scientific opinions to the public and explain that contrary to Mr Drosten’s doomsday prophecies there was no reason for the public to panic. Incidentally, Lord Sumption, who served as a judge at the British Supreme Court from 2012 to 2018, had done the very same thing, at the very same time, it had come to the very same conclusion, that there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for the corona measures.

Likewise, the former President of the German Federal Constitutional Court expressed, albeit more cautiously, serious doubts that the corona measures were constitutional. But instead of taking note of these other opinions and discussing them with David Sieber, the green party leadership declared that Mr Drosten’s panic messages were good enough for the German party. For the green party, remember, they’re not a member of the ruling coalition; they’re the opposition. Still that was enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the federal government as a basis for its lockdown decision, they said.

Subsequently, the green party leadership called David Sieber a conspiracy theorist, without ever having considered the content of his information and then stripped him of his mandates.

Now, let’s take a look at the current, actual situation regarding the virus’s danger; the complete uselessness of PCR tests for the detection of infections; and the lockdowns based on non-existent infections.

In the meantime, we know that the health care systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed by COVID-19. On the contrary, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now facing bankruptcy.

The hospital ship Comfort which anchored in New York at the time, and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than some 20 patients. Nowhere was there any excess mortality.

Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis and others have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu; even the pictures from Bergamo and New York that were used to demonstrate to the world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately misleading.

Then, the so-called ‘panic paper’ was leaked which was written by the German Department of the Interior. Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that in fact the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream media. The accompanying irresponsible statements of the head of the RKI, remember the CDC, Mr Wieler who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the corona measures must be followed unconditionally by the population, without them asking any question shows that he followed the script verbatim. In his public statements he kept announcing that the situation was very grave and threatening although the figures compiled by his own institute proved the exact opposite.

Among other things, the panic paper calls for children to be made to feel responsible and, I quote, for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules; that is, if they do not wash their hands constantly and don’t stay away from their grandparents.

A word of clarification: in Bergamo, the vast majority of deaths, 94 percent to be exact, turned out to be the result, not of COVID-19, but rather the consequence of the government deciding to transfer sick patients, sick with probably the cold or seasonal flu, from hospitals to nursing homes – in order to make room at the hospitals for all the COVID-19 patients, who ultimately never arrived. There at the nursing homes, they then infected old people with a severely weakened immune system, usually as a result of pre-existing medical conditions, in addition, a flu vaccination which had previously been administered had further weakened the immune systems of the people in the nursing homes.

In New York only some, but by far not all, hospitals were overwhelmed. Many people, most of whom were again elderly and had serious pre-existing medical conditions and most of whom had it not been for the panic mongering would have just stayed at home to recover, raced to the hospitals. There many of them fell victim to healthcare-associated infections, or nosocomial infections on the one hand and incidents of malpractice on the other hand, for example: by being put on a respirator rather than receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask.

Again to clarify, COVID-19, this is the current state of affairs, is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is a dangerous disease and of course COVID-19, just like the seasonal flu may sometimes take a severe clinical course and will sometimes kill patients.

However, as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in Germany, in particular by the forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel, in Hamburg, the fatalities he examined had almost all been caused by serious pre-existing conditions and almost all of the people who had died, had died at a very old age, just like in Italy, meaning they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.

In this context the following should also be mentioned: the German RKI, that is again the equivalent of the CDC, had initially, strangely enough, recommended that no autopsies be performed and there are numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals worldwide had been paid money for declaring a deceased person a victim of COVID-19 rather than writing down the true cause of death on the death certificate, for example a heart attack or a gunshot wound. Without the autopsies we would never know that the overwhelming majority of the alleged COVID-19 victims had died of completely different diseases but not of COVID-19.

The assertion that the lockdown was necessary because there were so many different infections with SARS-CoV-2 and because the healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong, for three reasons, as we have learned from the hearings we conducted with the Corona Committee and from other data that has become available in the meantime.

  1. a) the lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating. By the time the lockdown was imposed the alleged infection rates were already dropping again.

  2. b) There’s already protection from the virus because of cross or t-cell immunity, apart from the above mentioned lockdown being imposed, when the infection rates were already dropping there is also cross or t-cell immunity in the general population against the coronaviruses contained in every flu or influenza wave. This is true, even if this time around a slightly different strain of the coronavirus was at work, and that is because the body’s own immune system remembers every virus it has ever battled in the past, and from this experience it also recognises a supposedly new but still similar strain of the virus from the corona family.

Incidentally that’s how the PCR test for the detection of an infection was invented by the now infamous Professor Drosten. At the beginning of January of 2020, based on this very basic knowledge, Mr Drosten developed his PCR test which supposedly detects an infection with SARS-CoV-2. Without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China, only having learned from social media reports that there was something going on in Wuhan, he started tinkering on his computer with what would become his corona PCR test.

For this he used an old SARS [severe respiratory syndrome] virus hoping it would be sufficiently similar to the allegedly new strain of the coronavirus found in Wuhan. Then he sent the result of his computer tinkering to China to determine whether the victims of the alleged new coronavirus tested positive. They did, and that was enough for the WHO to sound the pandemic alarm and to recommend the worldwide use of the Drosten PCR test for the detection of infections with the virus now called SARS-CoV-2.

Drosten’s opinion and advice was, this must be emphasised, once again the only source for the German Government when it announced the lockdown, as well as the rules for social distancing and the mandatory wearing of masks; and this must also be emphasised once again, Germany apparently became the centre of, especially, massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical and tech. industry because the world, was referenced to the allegedly disciplined Germans, should do as the Germans do in order to survive the pandemic.

  1. c) and this is the most important part of our fact-finding. The PCR test is being used on the basis of false statements, not based on scientific facts with respect to infections. In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do not give any indication of an infection with any virus let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Note: not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasised. Instead they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any disease. That is, contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they’re infected with anything let alone with the contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Even the United States CDC, even this institution, agrees with this and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests dated July 13 2020.

First bullet point says: detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019 nCoV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms

Second bullet point says: the performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of two threat 2019 nCoV infection

Third bullet point says: this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens

It is still not clear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation of the Wuhan virus so that nobody knows exactly what we’re looking for when we test; especially, since this virus, just like the flu viruses mutates quickly.

The PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible. Everything over 35 cycles is, as reported by the New York Times and others, considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable.

However, the Drosten test as well as the WHO recommended tests that followed his example are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?

The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter: that means that a positive result may happen because the test detects, for example, a piece of debris, a fragment of a molecule, which may signal nothing else more than the immune system of the person tested won a battle with a common cold in the past.

Even Drosten himself declared in an interview with a German business magazine in 2014, at that time concerning the alleged detection of an infection with the MERS virus allegedly with the help of the PCR test, that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive. At that time, he also became very much aware of the powerful role of a panic and fear-mongering media, as you’ll see at the end of the following quote, he said then in this interview: “If for example such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucosa of a nurse for a day or so without her getting sick, or noticing anything, then she’s suddenly a MERS case.”

This could also explain the explosion of case numbers in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the media there have made this into an incredible sensation. Has he forgotten this or is he deliberately concealing this in the corona context because corona is a very lucrative business opportunity for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, and for Mr Alford Lund, his co-author in many studies, and also a PCR test producer.

In my view, it is completely implausible that he forgot in 2020 what he knew about the PCR tests and told the business magazine in 2014. In short this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it can, an infection, a so-called hot infection requires that the virus or rather a fragment of a molecule which may be a virus is not just found somewhere, for example, in the throat of a person without causing any damage that would be a cold infection, rather a hot infection requires that the virus penetrates into the cells, replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore throat. Only then is a person really infected; in the sense of a hot infection; because only then is a person contagious, that is able to infect others, until then it is completely harmless for both the host and all other people that the host comes into contact with.

Once again, this means that positive test results, contrary to all other claims by Drosten, Wieler or the WHO mean nothing, with respect to infections, as even the CDC knows as quoted above.

Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic but only a PCR test pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists such as Professors Bhakdi, Rice, Mölling, Hockerts, Wallach and many others including the above mentioned Professor John Ioannidis and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt, from Stanford University. The most recent such opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr Mike Yeadon, a former vice president and chief science officer at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years. He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific paper in September of 2020 and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on September 20th 2020.

Among other things, he and they state, and I quote: “We’re basing our government policy, our economic policy and the policy of restricting fundamental rights presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus. If it weren’t for the test results that are constantly reported in the media, the pandemic would be over, because nothing really happened.”

Of course, there are some serious individual cases of illness but there are also some in every flu epidemic. There was a real wave of disease in March and April but since then everything has gone back to normal. Only the positive results rise and sink wildly again and again, depending on how many tests are carried out, but the real cases of illnesses are over. There can be no talk of a second wave. The allegedly new strain of the coronavirus is, Dr Yeadon continues, only new in that it is a new type of the long known coronavirus; there are at least four coronaviruses that are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have a striking sequence similarity to the coronavirus and because the human immune system recognises the similarity to the virus that has now, allegedly, been newly discovered, a t-cell immunity has long existed in this respect, 30 percent of the population had this before the, allegedly, new virus even appeared. Therefore, it is sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that 15 to 25 percent of the population are infected with the allegedly new coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus, and this has long been the case.

Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeadon writes in a piece called: ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives’, dated September 20th 2020 and I quote: ‘…The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty…’. Dr Yeadon, in agreement with the professors of immunology, Camera from Germany, Capel from the Netherlands and Cahill from Ireland as well as a microbiologist, Dr Harvey from Austria, all of whom testified before the German corona committee, explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.

The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is, and I quote: “Simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus which could be a piece of dead virus, which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted and cannot make anyone else sick – because of the complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of infectious diseases – tested positive in goats, sheep, papayas and even chicken wings.

Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine writes that the COVID-19 virus would never disappear, if this test practice were to be continued, but would always be falsely detected, in much of what is tested. Lockdowns as Yeadon and his colleagues found out, do not work.

Sweden with its laissez-faire approach and Great Britain with its strict lockdown, for example, have completely comparable disease and mortality statistics. The same was found by US scientists concerning the different US states; it makes no difference to the incidence of disease whether a state implements a lockdown or not.

With regard to the now infamous, Imperial College of London’s, Professor Neil Ferguson and his completely false computer model; models warning of millions of deaths; he [Yeadon] says that, and I quote: “No serious scientist gives any validity to Ferguson’s model.” He points out, with thinly veiled contempt, again I quote: “It’s important that you know most scientists don’t accept that it, that is Ferguson’s model, was even faintly right but the government is still wedded to the model.”

Ferguson predicted 40 000 corona deaths in Sweden by May and a hundred thousand by June but it remained at five thousand eight hundred which, according to the Swedish authorities, is equivalent to a mild flu. If the PCR tests had not been used as a diagnostic tool for corona infections there would not be a pandemic and there would be no lockdowns but everything would have been perceived as just a medium or light wave of influenza these scientists conclude. Dr Yeadon in his piece: ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives’ writes: “This test is fatally flawed and must immediately be withdrawn and never used again in this setting, unless shown to be fixed.” And towards the end of that article: “I have explained how a hopelessly performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease but it seems solely to create fear.”

Now, let’s take a look at the current actual situation regarding the severe damage caused by the lockdowns and other measures. Another detailed paper written by a German official in the Department of the Interior, who is responsible for risk assessment and the protection of the population against risks, was leaked recently. It is now called the False Alarm paper. This paper comes to the conclusion that there was, and is, no sufficient evidence for serious health risks for the population, as claimed by Drosten, Wieler, and the WHO. But the author says there’s very much evidence of the corona measures causing gigantic health and economic damage to the population which he then describes in detail in this paper. This he concludes will lead to very high claims for damages, which the government will be held responsible for. This has now become reality but the paper’s author was suspended.

More and more scientists but also lawyers recognise that as a result of the deliberate panic-mongering and the corona measures enabled by this panic, democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models.

As I already mentioned above, in Australia people who do not wear the masks, which more and more studies show are hazardous to health, or who allegedly do not wear them correctly, are arrested, handcuffed and thrown into jail. In the Philippines they run the risk of getting shot but even in Germany and in other previously, civilised countries, children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with quarantine regulations, distance regulations and mask wearing -regulations.

According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the corona committee, children are traumatised en masse, with the worst psychological consequences yet to be expected in the medium and long term. In Germany alone, 500 000 to 800 000 bankruptcies are expected in the fall to strike small and medium-sized businesses which form the backbone of the economy. This will result in incalculable tax losses and incalculably high and long-term social security money transfers for among other things unemployment benefits. Since in the meantime, pretty much everybody is beginning to understand the full devastating impact of the completely unfounded corona measures, I will refrain from detailing this any further.

Let me now give you a summary of the legal consequences; the most difficult part of a lawyer’s work is always to establish the true facts. Not the application of the legal rules to these facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer does not learn this at law school but his Anglo-American counterparts do get the necessary training for this, at their law schools, and probably for this reason, but also because of the much more pronounced independence of the American, Anglo-American judiciary, the Anglo-American law of evidence is much more effective in practice than the German one.

A court of law can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it has previously determined the facts correctly, which is not possible without looking at all the evidence and that’s why the law of evidence is so important. On the basis of the facts summarised above, in particular, those established with the help of the work of the German corona committee, the legal evaluation is actually simple. It is simple for all civilised legal systems regardless of whether these legal systems are based on civil law, which follows the Roman law more closely, or whether they are based on Anglo-American common law which is only loosely connected to Roman law.

Let’s first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures; a number of German law professors including Professors Kingreen, Morswig, Youngblood and Foskarau have stated either in written expert opinions or in interviews in line with the serious doubts expressed by the former president of the federal constitutional court with respect to the constitutionality of the corona measures, that these measures, the corona measures, are without a sufficient factual basis and also without a sufficient legal basis and are therefore unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately.

Very recently, a judge, Torsten Schleife is his name, declared publicly that the German judiciary, just like the general public has been so panic-stricken that it was no longer able to administer justice properly. He says that the courts of law, and I quote: “Have all too quickly waved through coercive measures which for millions of people all over Germany represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights.” He points out that German citizens, again I quote: “Are currently experiencing the most serious encroachment on their constitutional rights since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949. In order to contain the corona pandemic federal and state governments have intervened, he says, massively and in part threatening the very existence of the country, as it is guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people.

What about fraud, intentional infliction of damage and crimes against humanity? Based on the rules of criminal law asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests or intentional risk misrepresentation, as it was committed by Messrs Drosten and Wieler as well as the WHO, can only be assessed as fraud. Based on the rules of civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage. The German Professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public interviews in a comprehensive legal opinion of around 180 pages. He has familiarised himself with the subject matter like no other legal scholar has done thus far and in particular has provided a detailed account of the complete failure of the mainstream media to report on the true facts of this so-called pandemic.

Messrs Drosten, Wieler and Tedros of the WHO all knew, based on their own expertise, or the expertise of their institutions, that the PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections but asserted over and over again to the general public that they can; with their counterparts all over the world repeating this. And they all knew, and accepted, that on the basis of their recommendations the governments of the world would decide on lockdowns, the rules for social distancing and mandatory wearing of masks. The latter, representing a very serious health hazard as more and more independent studies and expert statements show.

Under the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by these PCR tests, PCR tests induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate, that is, a duty to pay damages, for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed persons as a result of the lockdown, and other measures.

In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused and continue to cause such devastating damage to the world’s population’s health and economy that the crimes committed by Messrs Drosten, Wieler and the WHO must be legally qualified as actual crimes against humanity, as defined in Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.

How can we do something? What can we do?

Well, the class action is the best route to compensatory damages and to political consequences. The so-called class action lawsuit is based on English law and exists today in the USA and in Canada. It enables a court of law to allow complaint for damages to be tried as a class action lawsuit at the request of a plaintiff, if:

as a result of a damage inducing event
a large number of people, suffer the same type of damage

Phrased differently, a judge can allow a class-action lawsuit to go forward if common questions of law and fact make up the vital component of the lawsuit. Here, the common questions of law in fact revolve around the worldwide PCR test based lockdowns and its consequences; just like the VW diesel passenger cars were functioning products but they were defective due to a so-called defeat device because they didn’t comply with the emissions standards, so too, the PCR tests, which are perfectly good products in other settings, are defective products when it comes to the diagnosis of infections.

Now if an American or Canadian company or an American or Canadian individual decides to sue these persons in the United States or Canada for damages, then the court called upon to resolve this dispute may, upon request, allow this complaint to be tried as a class action lawsuit. If this happens all affected parties worldwide will be informed about this through publications in the mainstream media and will thus have the opportunity to join this class action within a certain period of time to be determined by the court. It should be emphasised that nobody must join the class action, but every injured party can join the class action. The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is needed, namely, to try the complaint of a representative plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone else in the class.

This is firstly cheaper, and secondly faster, than hundreds of thousands or more individual lawsuits and thirdly it imposes less of a burden on the courts, fourthly as a rule, it allows a much more precise examination of the accusations than would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands or, more likely in this corona setting, even millions of individual lawsuits.

In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American law of evidence, with its pre-trial discovery, is applicable. This requires that all evidence relevant for the determination of the lawsuit is put on the table. In contrast to the typical situation in German lawsuits with structural imbalance, that is, lawsuits involving on the one hand a consumer and on the other hand a powerful corporation; the withholding or even destruction of evidence is not without consequence, rather the party withholding or even destroying evidence loses the case under these evidence rules.

Here in Germany, a group of tort lawyers have banded together to help their clients with recovery of damages. They have provided all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to both estimate how much damage they have suffered and join the group or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it goes forward either in Canada or the US.

Initially, this group of lawyers had considered to also collect and manage the claims for damages of other non-German plaintiffs but this proved to be unmanageable.

However, through an international lawyers’ network, which is growing larger by the day, the German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues, in all other countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections and they also provide them with all relevant information as to how they can prepare and bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that they too can assert their clients claims for damages either in their home countries, courts of law, or within the framework of the class action as explained above.

These scandalous corona facts gathered mostly by the corona committee and summarised above are the very same facts that will soon be proven to be true, either in one court of law or in many courts of law, all over the world. These are the facts that will pull the masks off the faces of all those responsible for these crimes.

To the politicians, who believe those corrupt people, these facts are hereby offered as a lifeline, that can help you readjust your course of action and start the long overdue public scientific discussion and not go down with those charlatans and criminals.

Thank you

Posted by Age of Autism on October 07, 2020 at 06:01 AM in Current Affairs


Posted in COVID, crime, hoax, legal, medical, Scandals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

By Their Law Shall We Know Them

The ideology of Islam fully implemented under Sharia Law, consistent with the koran, sira and hadith, condemns freedom (speech, conscience, religion association, press, petition of government), forbids equality (between men and women, muslims and non-muslims) and denies traditional sovereignty (national boundaries, secular law, native culture). Any form of sharia, implicit (in mosques and ‘at home’) or explicit (as practiced in UK civil courts, as promoted by the Organization of the Islamic Conference to the United Nations), denies human rights to women, children and non-muslims. Therefore, allowing sharia in this Constitutional Republic or any non-islamic nation violates our basic laws of freedom, including freedom of choice. The tenets of islam as codified in sharia* are supremacist, discriminatory and misogynist; they invite or encourage deception toward non-muslims and mandate perpetual hostility to that which is not islamic. Sharia must be banned as being unConstitutional and its promotion labeled seditious, as it calls for the replacement of man-made law with “divine” sharia.

Whatever in islam that may be spiritual and promote the salvation of the soul is of little interest to me, unless and until it affects non-muslims, at which point it becomes political doctrine. And if this political doctrine calls for harm, subjugation, taxation, terrorizing and death, it is a free-people’s right and obligation to resist.

Speak about islam and sharia in this way. Challenge your listeners not to believe anything about islam that is not consistent with the foundational texts of islam and its body of law, for to do so is to be deceived and ignorant.

*Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law here


Posted in Constitution, Islam, Islam apologists, legal, multiculturalism, Politics, Sharia law, social engineering, terrorism | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Coming Coup?

Michael Anton

Democrats are laying the groundwork for revolution right in front of our eyes.

As if 2020 were not insane enough already, we now have Democrats and their ruling class masters openly talking about staging a coup. You might have missed it, what with the riots, lockdowns and other daily mayhem we’re forced to endure in this, the most wretched year of my lifetime. But it’s happening.

It started with the military brass quietly indicating that the troops should not follow a presidential order. They were bolstered by many former generals—including President Trump’s own first Secretary of Defense—who stated openly what the brass would only hint at. Then, as nationwide riots really got rolling in early June, the sitting Secretary of Defense himself all but publicly told the president not to invoke the Insurrection Act. His implicit message was: “Mr. President, don’t tell us to do that, because we won’t, and you know what happens after that.”

All this enthused Joe Biden, who threw subtlety to the winds. The former United States Senator (for 26 years) and Vice President (for eight) has not once, not twice, but thrice confidently asserted that the military will “escort [Trump] from the White House with great dispatch” should the president refuse to leave. Another former Vice President, Al Gore, publicly agreed.

One might dismiss such comments as the ravings of a dementia patient and a has-been who never got over his own electoral loss. But before you do, consider also this. Over the summer a story was deliberately leaked to the press of a meeting at which 100 Democratic grandees, anti-Trump former Republicans, and other ruling class apparatchiks got together (on George Soros’s dime) to “game out” various outcomes of the 2020 election. One such outcome was a clear Trump win. In that eventuality, former Bill Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, playing Biden, refused to concede, pressured states that Trump won to send Democrats to the formal Electoral College vote, and trusted that the military would take care of the rest.

The leaked report from the exercise darkly concluded that “technocratic solutions, courts, and reliance on elites observing norms are not the answer here,” promising that what would follow the November election would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.”

Two more data points (among several that could be provided). Over the summer, two former Army officers, both prominent in the Democrat-aligned “national security” think tank world, wrote an open letter to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in which they urged him to deploy the 82nd Airborne Division to drag President Trump from the Oval Office at precisely 12:01 PM, January 20, 2021.

About a month later, Hillary Clinton declared publicly that Joe Biden should not concede the election “under any circumstances.” The old English major in me interprets the word “any” to mean “no,” “none,” “nada,” “niente,” “zero,” “zilch” “bupkis”…you get the idea.

This doesn’t sound like the rhetoric of a political party confident it will win an upcoming election.

The Cover-Up in Plain Sight

These items are, to repeat, merely a short but representative list of what Byron York recently labeled “coup porn.” York seems to think this is just harmless fantasizing on the part of the ruling class and its Democratic servants. For some of them, no doubt that’s true. But for all of them? I’m not so sure.

In his famously exhaustive discussion of conspiracies, Machiavelli goes out of his way to emphasize the indispensability of “operational security”—i.e., silence—to success. The first rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy. The second rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy.

So why are the Democrats—publicly—talking about the conspiracy?

Because they know that, for it to succeed, it must not look like a conspiracy. They need to plant the idea in the public mind, now, that their unlawful and illegitimate removal of President Trump from office will somehow be his fault.

Never mind the pesky detail that the president would refuse to leave only if he were convinced he legitimately won. Remember: Biden should not concede under any circumstances.

The second part of the plan is either to produce enough harvested ballots—lawfully or not—to tip close states, or else dispute the results in close states and insist, no matter what the tally says, that Biden won them. The worst-case scenario (for the country, but not for the ruling class) would be results in a handful of states that are so ambiguous and hotly disputed that no one can rightly say who won. Of course, that will not stop the Democrats from insisting that they won.

The public preparation for that has also already begun: streams of stories and social media posts “explaining” how, while on election night it might look as if Trump won, close states will tip to Biden as all the mail-in ballots are “counted.”

The third piece is to get the vast and loud Dem-Left propaganda machine ready for war. That leaked report exhorted Democrats to identify “key influencers in the media and among local activists who can affect political perceptions and mobilize political action…[who could] establish pre-commitments to playing a constructive role in event of a contested election.” I.e., in blaring from every rooftop that “Trump lost.”

At this point, it’s safe to assume that unless Trump wins in a blowout that can’t be overcome by cheating and/or denied via the ruling class’s massive propaganda operation, that’s exactly what every Democratic politician and media organ will shout.

Stop the Presses

What then? The Podesta assumption is that the military will side with the Dems. There are reasons to fear they might. The Obama administration spent a great deal of political capital purging the officer corps of anyone not down with the program and promoting only those who are.

Still and all, determining the outcome of an election would be the most open political interference possible from our allegedly apolitical military, and it’s plausible that the brass won’t want to make its quiet support of the ruling class agenda that overt. The aforementioned Chairman has already stated that the military will play “no role” in the outcome of the election. That’s probably not a feint, but one wonders if it will hold given the obvious attempt to influence military thinking by people like Jeffrey Goldberg in his recent Atlantic essay.

Can the Dems rely on the Secret Service to drag Trump out? I have my doubts on this one. I’ve seen the Service up close; it really is (or strongly appears to be) apolitical. It has a job to do: protect the president, whoever that is. Officers take that job very seriously. If they don’t believe Trump lost, I don’t think they can be counted on to oust him. On the other hand, were they to believe he did lose and was refusing to leave—a scenario I find impossible to imagine but the Democrats insist is just around the corner—it’s possible the Service might act.

Barring all that, what’s left? Remember that phrase from the Dem war game: “street fight.” In other words, a repeat of this summer, only much, much bigger. Crank the propaganda to ear-drum shattering decibels and fill the streets of every major city with “protesters.” Shut down the country and allow only one message to be heard: “Trump must go.”

I.e., what’s come to be known as a “color revolution,” the exact same playbook the American deep state runs in other countries whose leadership they don’t like and is currently running in Belarus. Oust a leader—even an elected one—through agitation and call it “democracy.”

The events of the last few months may be interpreted as an attempted color revolution that failed to gain enough steam, or as a trial run for the fall. Is the Trump Administration prepared?

Here’s one thing they could do: play their own “war game” scenario so as to game out possibilities and minimize surprises. They should also be talking to people inside and outside of government whom they absolutely trust to get a clearer sense of who on the inside won’t go along with a coup and who might.

They also need to set up or shore up—now—communication channels that don’t rely on the media or Big Tech. Once the ruling class gives word that the narrative is “Trump lost,” all the president’s social media accounts will be suspended. The T.V. channels, with the likely exception of Fox News, will refuse to cover anything he says. Count on it. He’s going to need a way to talk to the American people and he has to find the means, now.

For the rest of us, the most important thing we can do is raise awareness. If there is a conspiracy to remove President Trump from office even if he wins, they’re telling you about it precisely to get you ready for it, so that when it happens you won’t think it was a conspiracy; you’ll blame the president.

Don’t be fooled.Michael Anton is a lecturer and research fellow at Hillsdale College’s Washington, D.C. campus, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute, and a former national security official in the Trump administration. He is the author of The Stakes: America at the Point of No Return.


Posted in coup, Deep State, Donald Trump, election, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Military, news media, Obama, purge, Uncategorized, Vote Fraud | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment


October 6, 2020

During the past 8 months, the people of the world have been broadsided by a highly-coordinated perpetration of fraud and global violations of the law by the very institutions charged with making these laws. The scale and scope of the scamdemic is staggering.

Previously, we ran a video with German litigation attorney, Dr Rainer Fuellmich, discussing the findings of an international committee of lawyers, doctors, and scientists, who determined that governments are liable under civil tort laws for the harm caused by their lockdowns; that governments can be held responsible for the damages they have inflicted upon the population; that individuals are entitled to receive full compensation for losses caused by their governments and that the avenue to pursue this is the class action lawsuit.

Today’s video by The Healthy American’s Peggy Hall shows us the next steps: 1) identifying the Federal and State laws being violated and 2) naming all of the officials who are violating these laws.

Last week, she appeared at California’s Orange County Board of Supervisors and Health Officer to notify them of the Federal and State laws they are violating, some of which carry decades and even life-in-prison penalties.

“Did you know that there is a Federal Law and it is Title 18 US Code §1038 and it is about false information and hoaxes. Yes! There actually is a Federal Law, where you go to prison if you provide false information or misleading information relating to biological hazards.

“Isn’t that incredible, how specific that is? ‘Related to biological hazards and to conducting hoaxes.’ Well, you know and I know this is all a hoax. This is one big hoax. I’m not saying there’s not a virus, I’m not saying it doesn’t exist. But the hoax is that there’s no emergency…

“This law is enforced by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security and the penalty is life in prison. So, I just told the Board of Supervisors that this is going to be one of the criminal charges in our lawsuit against them. And there are plenty of public officials that are in prison. In fact, I’ve got a whole list of like 12, just here in California…

“These are public officials in California that are guilty and behind bars. You know the Sheriff of Los Angeles? The FORMER Sheriff of Los Angeles? He’s behind bars. No one is above the law. OK?

“This is a lawsuit that’s going to be filed in Federal Courts, as well as California Courts, so that penalty is life in prison.

“Then, did you know that there is a Federal Law. It is Title 18 US Code §1040 and that is Fraud in Connection with Major Disaster or Benefits – and that’s what’s happening here. They’re declaring an emergency, in order to get money, so that’s fraudulent and the penalty here is 30 years in prison…So, let’s see, life in prison plus 30 years in prison. They’re gonna be there a long time.

“Now, there are other laws here, in California Government Code §8630, calling for a local emergency when there isn’t one – that’s actually against the law…I schooled them on that. And also, the California Health and Safety Code §101080, this body, right here that I was speaking to, the Board of Supervisors is required by law to proclaim the termination of the local emergency at the earliest possible date.

“OK, we’re like 8 or 9 months in, this whole thing is ridiculous…Where they’re wrong is that they think they’re above the law. They think that they’re gonna have immunity…But they’re not. Because there’s no emergency. If there’s no emergency, then the emergency law doesn’t apply.

“Also, in California, there’s a law for fraud, California Penal Code §504, so a public officer, when they fraudulently use any public property or funds – and they are using these funds fraudulently. They are using these funds to put up billboards to stay 6 feet apart – oh, my gosh, the list of laws that they’re breaking is unbelievable. How about this…California Penal Code §148.3 – is the California statute that makes it a crime for a person to make a false report of an emergency…

“And I have many more, but those are some of the highlights. When I called my Board of Supervisors…they literally said these words: ‘You know, we’re not really up on the law.’ Even though we’re a law-making body, ‘we’re not up on the law!’

“So, guess what? I’m up on the law…I’m going to show all of you, Friends, so you can copy the information and share it with your Board of Supervisors or County Commissioners, or whatever you call them in your area, because these Federal Laws apply to everyone.

“And I am working with the same attorney who has filed the Federal lawsuit in Ohio and we are putting together our legal team here, in California and this Board of Supervisors and all the Boards of Supervisors who are violating the law are going to be named in this lawsuit…

“They have the chance, right now to terminate this emergency, that’s why they’ve met. So, the Health Officer presents the information or lack of information. Really, there’s no information – there’s no data, there’s no evidence that this is an emergency, so they are bound by law…

“In the California Emergency Services Act Article §8630 says, ‘The governing body shall determine the termination of the local health emergency.’

“Now, listen, the Governor is using these people as his foot soldiers to do his dirty work. Because the Governor came out with this playbook, which is a defacto – which means, without quite saying it, he’s saying it – that there is no emergency. It’s a re-opening plan.

“So, there is no emergency, there never has been an emergency, we’ve been onto them for several months. They persist in breaking the law…because, they’re either ignorant, incompetent or intentionally duplicitous, which means they are intentionally doing this for their own gain. Maybe they think they’re going to get political favors or what have you. But what they’re actually going to get is a jumpsuit and a prison cell.”

Peggy is putting together the Healthy American Legal Network in every state. You may email her here if you want to get on board with these Federal lawsuits:


Posted in corruption, COVID, hoax, Politics, Scandals | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Most Traitorous Man


The Chinese Commie bastards gave Hunter $1.5 billion. The deal was (IS) he will use the loot only to buy American companies holding technical patents and working on DOD contracts and then arrange to sell them to Chinese companies tied to the Chinese military.

Hunter Biden helped facilitate China ’s acquisition of *Henniges Automotive. Hunter Biden’s communist funded investment company in China , known as Bohai Harvest RST, is funded by communist controlled banks to buy a range of industries in the U.S. and sell them to Chinese front companies. Bohai Harvest has put commie money into an automotive firm, mining companies, and technology ventures. (Hunter Biden, OF COURSE did not respond to a request for comment.)

  • Henniges Automotive Acquired by AVIC Automotive Systems Holding Co., Ltd. of China , a PLA controlled outfit.

Bohai Harvest relies completely on the state-owned communist Bank of China (BOC) to finance its investments. Bohai Harvest refers to itself as an “investment platform under the BOC”on its website. Hunter’s spy investment fund partners with a communist subsidiary of the HNA Group. HNA is the parent of Hainan Airlines and a dozen other anti-American communist subsidiaries. It has pumped $40 billion into American and overseas acquisitions. Hunter and his Commie masters purpose is to gut and weaken American business by stealing more American technical information. Hunter’s company is a front for Chinese spying!

The HNA spy Group has made extensive efforts to co-opt (bribe and threaten) U.S. officials. Hunter’s company offered to buy out the hedge fund owned by former White House official Anthony Scaramucci. Hunter, with his Fathers agreement, retained the legal services of Gary Locke, the former U.S. ambassador to China , shortly before his confirmation; and provided Chinese money to a private-equity firm backed by Jeb Bush. Hunter’s corrupt spying company with HNA Group notably also bribed Bill Clinton, arranging paid meetings with the former president at philanthropy events hosted by Hunter.

The Bank of China has also made overtures (bribes) to many other U.S. political elites. None of them can now speak against China lest they be publically outted, they are bought and paid for. Many dozens of them are sitting congressmen and senators. Shortly after the 2016 presidential election the company added Angela Chao, the sister of Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao and sister-in-law of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to its board of directors at a huge salary. There are no board meetings, this is purely a bribe.

Along with a number of politically connected Americans, Hunter Biden’s criminal commie investment vehicle has been burrowing deeply into America for the last 10 years. In 2008 Hunter Biden tried to separate (politically distance) himself from Oldaker, Biden and Belair, a Washington, D.C., firm he co-founded alongside William Oldaker, a longtime fundraiser and legal adviser to Joe Biden. This was to keep his dirty Chinese spying activities from tarnishing his father’s chances of becoming Obama’s VP.

The following year, Hunter Biden, along with former Secretary of State John Kerry’s criminal stepson Christopher Heinz; Kerry-Heinz family friend Devon Archer; and former Oldaker partner Eric Schwerin, founded several new Chinese front companies using the name Rosemont Seneca.

Hunter is a Chinese asset and a traitor. Everything he has done was and is with the full knowledge and cooperation of his corrupt demented old dad. How such treacherous traitorous activity goes on day after day is impossible to understand unless it has the cooperation of our intelligence and justice department. How? Imagine, someone puts ten million tax free bucks into a safe offshore account and asks only that you do nothing. How many would say no?

America, China is drooling soy sauce at the prospect of a corrupt future Biden administration.
We’re in real trouble! If Biden should win.

author Robert Firth

Posted in corruption, Politics, Scandals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Guns Owners of America Hits Facebook with FEC Complaint for Allegedly Helping Kamala Harris

By Randy DeSoto
Published October 6, 2020 at 8:31pm

Gun Owners of America filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission Tuesday alleging Facebook, AFP Fact Check and vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris violated campaign finance laws.

At the center of the complaint is Facebook’s handling of two articles fact-checked by AFP.

The articles — one written by Cam Edwards for Bearing Arms and another by GOA’s Rachel Malone for the Houston Courant — highlighted Harris’ decision as San Francisco’s district attorney in 2008 to sign on to an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller arguing against the individual right to keep and bear arms.

At issue in the case was whether the District of Columbia’s total ban on possessing handguns was unconstitutional.

In the amicus brief, Harris and other district attorneys argued, “the Second Amendment provides only a militia-related right to bear arms.”

The Supreme Court found that narrow interpretation of the amendment’s language to be wrong.

“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home,” the court held in an opinion authored by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Regardless of the backing both Edwards and Malone offered in support of their articles about Harris, Facebook-approved fact-checker AFP found both to be “false news” and Facebook penalized GOA for sharing them, the group’s Virginia state director, John Crump, told The Western Journal.

Crump also posted the Harris-signed amicus brief by itself with no additional comment, “and they marked that as false.”Do you think Facebook is trying to help Kamala Harris?Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“GOA groups on Facebook were all limited [in reach] at the same time because [Facebook] said that GOA was pushing false information about Kamala Harris,” he said.

Crump, who is also a journalist, reached out to Facebook’s press office questioning the way the company was handling the matter, noting both articles were “easily verifiable.”

“Why does Facebook allow the AFP to keep marking articles as false when a quick Google search would turn up the amicus brief?” he asked.

Less than an hour after he sent the emailed media query to Facebook, his personal Facebook account and fan page were shut down, he told The Western Journal.

Crump, who used to work as an engineer for Facebook, was shocked. He was further informed the decision was final, with no appeal possible.

Crump is also amazed that a foreign entity could have such power over Americans’ free speech.

“The AFP was the one who was fact-checking all this stuff incorrectly,” he said. “The AFP is basically the French version of the Associated Press.”

There is one major difference, however. AFP (which stands for Agence France-Press) gets much of its funding from the French government and government officials are members of its board.

The GOA’s FEC complaint observes, “Facebook has recruited an agent of a European government to control which messages about U.S. elections may be heard, and which should be suppressed.

“Based on its favored status within Facebook, AFP Fact Check has been given access to the Facebook site, along with the unilateral powers to declare information it opposes to be ‘False News,’ to censor, diminish, or even remove opposing views that are posted on Facebook, and to superimpose AFP’s own version of the alleged ‘truth’ in its place.”

The GOA complaint alleges that Facebook, by suppressing truthful articles about Harris’ Second Amendment record, is making “in-kind” contributions to her campaign in violation of federal law.

Additionally, by labeling articles false that are not, AFP Fact Check is violating prohibitions against foreign nationals making in-kind contributions “for the purpose of influencing a federal election.”

Crump said the restrictions on the GOA Facebook pages were eventually lifted, but Facebook never restored his personal accounts.

“So it seems like that was kind of a retaliation,” he said.

The GOA complaint notes that Facebook is heavily staffed by Democrats.

In 2016, the company’s employees gave over $2.3 million to candidates to the approximately $160,000 contributed to Republicans.

This election cycle Facebook’s employees have contributed 80 times more to the Biden/Harris ticket: $560,493 compared to the $7,005 to Trump’s campaign.

The GOA complaint alleges that both Facebook and AFP Fact Check are using “corporate time and resources to target and remove political speech critical of their favored candidate” and thereby making illegal in-kind contributions to the Biden/Harris campaign.

“It can be reasonably concluded that the conspiracy undertaken by Facebook and AFP is not intended to protect the public against ‘false news,’ but rather to ensure that the public is not exposed to information critical of the Democratic political candidates favored by Facebook and the French company AFP,” the complaint reads.

The Western Journal reached out to Facebook for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


Posted in corruption, crime, disinformation, Donald Trump, election, leftist bullying, liberal intolerance/persecution, media bias, media bias, news media | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Russian Collusion: It Was Hillary Clinton All Along

  • 07:00 PM ET 08/13/2018 Investors editorial

Russia Investigation: It’s beginning to look as if claims of monstrous collusion between Russian officials and U.S. political operatives were true. But it wasn’t Donald Trump who was guilty of Russian collusion. It was Hillary Clinton and U.S. intelligence officials who worked with Russians and others to entrap Trump.Volume 0%01:0801:08

That’s the stunning conclusion of a RealClear Investigations report by Lee Smith, who looked in-depth at the controversial June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between officials of then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign staff and a Russian lawyer known to have ties with high-level officials in Vladimir Putin’s government.

The media have spun a tale of Trump selling his soul to the Russians for campaign dirt to use against Hillary, beginning with the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting.

But “a growing body of evidence … indicates that the meeting may have been a setup — part of a broad effort to tarnish the Trump campaign involving Hillary Clinton operatives employed by Kremlin-linked figures and Department of Justice officials,” wrote Smith.

Smith painstakingly weaves together the evidence that’s already out there but has been largely ignored by the mainstream media, which have become so seized with Trump-hatred that their reporting even on routine matters can no longer be trusted.

But he adds in more evidence that the Justice Department only recently handed over to Congress. And It’s damning.

Memos, emails and texts now in Congress’ possession show that the Justice Department and the FBI worked together both before and after the election with Fusion GPS and their main link to the scandal, former British spy and longtime FBI informant Chris Steele.

As a former British spook in Moscow, Steele had extensive ties to Russia. That’s why he was picked as the primary researcher to compile the “unverified and salacious” Trump dossier, as former FBI Director James Comey once described it.

Steele’s dossier, for which Fusion reportedly received $1 million, was largely based on interviews with Russian officials. And who paid that $1 million? As we and others have reported, it was Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, then under Hillary’s control.

The media knew all this, of course, but largely ignored it.

The great irony here is that, after more than two years of investigating, the only real evidence of collusion with Russians at all points to Hillary Clinton. It was she who hired Steele to dig up dirt on Trump using Russian sources.

But now, it turns out, it goes even deeper than that.

Events surrounding that now-famous June 2016 Trump meeting suggest it, too, was a concoction of Hillary Clinton and her deep-state allies. And that meeting was the basis for much of the later Russian collusion “investigation,” if it can even be called that.

Bruce Ohr, the No. 4-ranking official at the Justice Department, “coordinated before, during and after the election” with both Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson and with Steele, notes Smith.

This shouldn’t come as a surprise, given that Ohr’s wife Nellie, a sometime employee of the CIA, was also working for Fusion GPS.

The FBI fired Steele in October 2016 after it discovered that he leaked information to the press. But that meant nothing. Bruce Ohr merely continued as the conduit from Fusion GPS for information related to Steele’s bogus Trump dossier.

The FBI and Justice used information from that 35-page document as the pretense for the FISA wiretap on Trump aide Carter Page. Far from being limited in scope, those wiretaps in essence provided a backdoor key to the entire Trump campaign — and the basis for the Russian investigation.

So far so good.

But an earlier investigation by RealClearPolitics showed that as early as March 2016, the FBI, other Western intelligence sources and Clinton campaign operatives contacted the Trump campaign about potentially damaging information about Clinton.

They were in effect live-trolling the campaign.

This is significant. Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Putin-connected lawyer who contacted the Trump campaign about having dirt on Hillary Clinton, was a client of Fusion GPS when she met with Donald Trump Jr. and others in the Trump campaign.

And she was accompanied by a former Soviet military counterintelligence official, now working as a lobbyist, named Rinat Akhmetshin.

Let that sink in for a moment.

What’s especially curious is that GPS’ Glenn Simpson admits he had dinner with Veselnitskaya both the night before and the night after the Trump Tower meeting.

Any possibility there was no discussion of the meeting between the two? Seems highly unlikely. Veselnitskaya herself subsequently claimed that the talking points for her meeting with the Trump people were provided to her by Simpson.

Once in the meeting, she quickly dropped the promises of having dirt on Hillary Clinton and instead brought up Russia’s long-standing desire to get rid of the Magnitsky Act, under which the U.S. imposed sanctions on a number of Russian moguls and government officials.

In short, they were baiting a trap for the Trump campaign to make it appear as if they were colluding with Russian officials.

Given the nonstop media coverage following leaks by the FBI and Justice, it seems the meeting served its purpose: It sowed the seeds of suspicion about the Trump campaign’s supposed Russian collusion.

The evidence goes even deeper than what we have summarized here. We suggest you read Smith’s piece, linked above.

Congress, using the documents it pried out of the Justice Department after repeated requests, is busy getting at what might turn out to be the scandal of the century. And Congress is now doing the work the Justice Department and FBI won’t.

“So here you have information flowing from the Clinton campaign from the Russians,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes told Fox News on Sunday.

Was Hillary The Real Colluder?

Nunes, who heads Congress’ investigation into the matter, said it was likely that information “was handed directly from Russian propaganda arms to the Clinton campaign, fed into the top levels of the FBI and Department of Justice to open up a counterintelligence investigation into a political campaign that has now colluded (with) nearly every top official at the DOJ and FBI over the course of the last couple years. Absolutely amazing.”

We have to agree. If all that is true, it is absolutely amazing. After all, these are serious felonies, using the federal agencies to spy on a political opponent in league with a hostile foreign power.

As we said, the only real collusion appears to be on the part of the Clinton campaign — aided by the Obama administration, CIA chief John Brennan and a handful of high-level officials at the Department of Justice and FBI.

President Trump is losing patience.

In comments made in a raucous rally in Indiana on Friday, just before the long holiday weekend, Trump inveighed against the Mueller investigation’s failure to look into Hillary Clinton: “You can have the biggest story about Hillary Clinton — I mean look at what she’s getting away with, and let’s see if she gets away with it.”

What’s next? It’s possible the collusion investigation soon will turn from Trump to Clinton. If so, it could lead to more resignations and possibly jail time for those involved. That includes perhaps even Hillary Clinton, who sits at the political epicenter of all this illegality.


Posted in Barrack Obama, crime, disinformation, Donald Trump, election, False Flag, Hillary Clinton, legal, media bias, media bias, news media, Obama, Politics, Scandals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How the howling media mob panicked our pathetic politicians?

By  David Craig, on October 7th, 2020

You can’t expect Einsteinian insights from a 600- to 700-word blog (with pictures for the hard-of-understanding) written at 05.00 in the morning. But I think I’m beginning to understand how our rulers allowed our economy to be trashed by the Xi Pingpong’s Wuhan flu and what to do about it now.

That was then…..

If you go back to the start of the Chinese plague, you’ll remember the images of thousands dying in hospital corridors and makeshift wards in Italy and Spain as their health services were overwhelmed by a tsunami of Chinese flu sufferers:

And there were lots of dead people:

Our politicians clearly couldn’t allow this situation to happen in the UK. So, as our (possibly scientifically-challenged) media started howling about the need for more hospital beds and more ventilators, our politicians were panicked into splashing £500m+ on ventilators (that were never necessary) and billions more on the new Nightingale hospitals (that were never needed):

However, despite our panicking politicians doing everything the screaming media mob demanded, the UK’s Chinese plague deaths (62 per 100,000 of population) ended up being just slightly lower than Spain (67 per 100,000) and higher than those of countries like Italy (59 per 100,000) and France (48.5 per 100,000):

Clearly the measures taken by our panicked politicians to appease the mouth-frothing media mob were as much use as the proverbial chocolate teapot. If I remember correctly, two of the most vociferous members of  the slavering (but ludicrously ill-informed?) media mob were a certain Robert Peston from ITV and Beth Somebody from Sky News.

This is now…..

Since then we have learnt a lot. Though I also suspect the howling media mob have learnt nothing.

For example, we now know that over half of Kong Flu patients put on ventilators die. So, thousands of hastily-produced ventilators weren’t such a great idea after all. We are also beginning to understand which medications can reduce the severity of infections and thus dramatically reduce death rates. And perhaps most importantly, we now know which age groups (the elderly) and which groups of people (the obese and those with comorbidities) will be worst affected.

As schools and universities are opened and as we move into the winter flu season, it is to be expected that the number of Chinese flu infections will shoot up:

But, as these infections are mainly among the young, death rates have remained extremely low:

In fact, I suspect that death rates from Xi Pingpong’s Wuhan lab plague aren’t much higher than the usual seasonal respiratory disease death rates.

When the facts change…….

That brings us to Mr Keynes’s much quoted and misquoted:

The facts about Xi’s Chinese plague have now changed. We now know who will die from Xi’s plague:

We also know ventilators are virtually a death sentence and so fewer people are being put on them:

And we now know that the way forward is medication – preferably used as early as possible during infection as was done with Donald Trump:

Are we now ready for ‘herd immunity’?

So, while we knew little to nothing about Xi’s plague at the start, lockdowns were an understandable reaction by scientifically-challenged politicians terrified by the scenes of chaos in Spanish and Italian hospitals and by projections of half a million UK deaths by the world-famous bonking boffin from Imperial College.

But with our new level of knowledge, it is total madness to be closing down the economy again. Instead we should be opening it up as fast as possible to save jobs and livelihoods while protecting the vulnerable and allowing herd immunity to develop among those who will have few if any harmful consequences from Xi’s plague.

Here’s the inimitable Tony Heller. I think he’s too harsh on politicians when he criticises their original decisions to go for lockdowns. I explain why above – the sight of the chaos and huge numbers of deaths in overwhelmed hospitals in Italy and Spain. But I believe he’s absolutely right to claim that now we should be going for herd immunity rather than cowering in our homes in fear of something that (for 99% of us) won’t be any worse than a seasonal flu:

But I also think our politicians are trapped by their own need to prove they are infallible. If they now dared to tell us that the policy should be changed from lockdown to herd immunity (remember Mr Keynes talking about when facts change?), they’re terrified that they will be lambasted getting it wrong with their original lockdown strategy. And so they continue on the road to economic self-destruction.


Posted in COVID, Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Media Flip Flop Hypocritically While Sputtering Hatred

Journo-political advocates on the left have been attacking President Trump for months for allegedly not agreeing with “the experts” at the WHO, the CDC, and medical doctors in general. It doesn’t matter that many of these experts have held diametrically opposed positions on issues such as the need to wear masks, they continue to attack him on this.

When it was announced that President Trump had tested positive for the virus which causes Covid-19 they were positively giddy. Pres. Trump checked into Walter Reed Hospital for testing and treatment. It wasn’t long before leftist media partisans began reporting that Trump was worse than we were being told, that Russian spies and the Kremlin knew more about the President’s actual health than the American public, and speculating whether the President was competent to govern while on the medications used to treat him.

When the President was discharged from Walter Reed and reported feeling no symptoms of the infection the media political activists suddenly began trashing his doctors for lying to the public, and for practicing recklessly.

These Democrat media activists from the “party of science” are now suddenly telling us we cannot trust the medical experts at Walter Reed Hospital. One has even called for Congress to defund it.

Many on the left took to twitter to say the 25th amendment should be invoked because they believe Trump may be experiencing side effects from some of the medications prescribed. Note that none of his doctors have suggested his judgement or abilities have been impaired. (These same people have no problem voting for Joe Biden, who frequently forgets what city he is in, or how to finish a sentence he starts.)

The hypocrisy of the left is on display continually as seen in “news” coverage. One of many nationwide, the Black Trans Lives Matter rallies, held in Brooklyn drew a tightly packed crowd of 15,000 in June of this year. There was no room for social distancing, yet the media coverage of this and similar events was all positive, with no criticism for the lack of social distancing. But these same leftists insist that outdoor Trump rallies are a huge public health risk.

As with earlier BLM mass gatherings, the media said the issue was more important than the virus. How do they justify this? By quoting a ridiculous letter by some ‘health professionals’ who said that Covid is caused by white supremacy, so the rallies were medically justified.

Posted in COVID, Donald Trump, medical | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment